• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Barefaced Bass 'BIG TWIN' ... lets talk about it...

A few degrees off axis for dedicated woofers in a cab with dedicated midrange drivers is nothing you, bandmates, or an audience is ever going to notice.

If the woofs were way more staggered, or if the midrange drivers were staggered off the y axis, it would mess up the imaging though.
 
With woofers that are only working up to around 1kHz there's no sonic difference between absolutely vertically aligned and slightly staggered off from the vertical. By moving the port from the bottom of the Big One to the side of the Big Twin we got the height to fit the drivers in vertically and that gave us the sonic advantage that it stops the height of the cab plus length of the port acting as a short (unwanted) transmission line, so the cab the performs as designed, and if you're playing very loud the cab is better cooled due to the chimney effect of the port so a fraction more power handling and less power compression. We also found this approach got us a stronger and stiffer cab for the same weight. Not big differences at all but as we could make some beneficial tweaks then why not?
 
Probably not, but in theory which is best?

I think I have seen BFM post more than a few times that there is give and take in every cabinet design. This discussion has gone from "mixing full range drivers is bad" to "which crossed over design is best?" I think they all have their good points, and every design will have some weaknesses. What can be said is that there is a strong sense of "as little compromise as possible" across the board. None of these designers have gone "hey let me put anything less than the best drivers in this cab, it will save a buck or two."