But it was really like Sabbath joined Dio.
I disagree. If anything, he had his guitarists in his solo band model their style on Tony Iommi. Tons of signature amazing riffs all over the albums with Dio.
I disagree with everything you said except the Beatles comment.
Thought the Dio Sabbath sucked and anything else Dio ever did, to me his singing sounds like a romance novel.
I think the makeup ran it's course with Alice Cooper and few others, and that Kiss should have never existed.
Kiss was designed for 10 year old boys who watch cartoons...and without makeup, no more cartoon characters, and they certainly were not musicians, so what's left?...even Bob Ezrin could not help Kiss.
Well, I think you're wrong. Rainbow was awesome. So were the albums Heaven & Hell, Mob Rules, Dehumanizer, and The Devil You Know. And I'll take any of his solo work over any of Ozzy's with the exception of Ozzy's first two solo albums (the ones with Randy).
Agreed on Kiss, though. Don't get the appeal.
As a HUGE Zeppelin and Queen fan:
1. Jimmy's descent into heroin (see 1977 tour of America)
2. Freddie's "Village People" mustache
3. Hot Space
4. Hats off to Roy Harper (arguably the only bad song in Zep's entire catalog)
Heroin is always a big, sad mistake.
Gotta disagree on that mustache, though. It was magnificent.
To further the thought...Paul stated in a RS article that he went into the studio with John after they had "broken up". The recordings were not good, therefore never released. The band were aways friends. (perhaps sometimes with differences) but, they were done as the Beatles. I think breaking up was the smartest move
I've heard a snippet. Really not good at all.
The band had to end, it was becoming too dysfunctional. The bright side is that the Beatles albums will always be good.
Do me the favor of not posting direct insults towards me here, try to keep them in your head until you can deliver them face to face.
That clarity of differentiation you speak of seems to always remain with people who are sure they are always right.
OK I've now read all 12 pages of this thread and not one person brought up a band that debuted in this century.
The closest was Rage Against the Machine and a request for Britney Spears to pose for Playboy.
Because Talkbass is a bunch of old guys.
I have one, though. Ihsahn deciding to use an 8 string guitar and that his solo music needed alto saxophone.
Laudanum breaking up.
Ludicra breaking up.
People trying to form doom bands without bassists.
At one point Eric Clapton, enamoured of The Band, flew to Woodstock to ask to join. It didn't happen. Discuss.
Good. Clapton sucks without Cream.
irrelevant. the statement was about firing ozzy, without that happening their never would've mob rules or heaven and hell. the fact that it went off course after dio in no way diminishes what that line up created.
Indeed. The real mistake was losing Dio. Twice.
Basically it comes down to whether or not you prefer Dio or Ozzy overall. I've never met anyone who likes Ozzy solo better than Dio solo yet prefer Dio Sabbath. Or vice versa.
Myself I've never cared much for Dio although I recognize the talent he had. Probably has to do with his style, that type of singer is definitely not my favorite. IMO everything pre-ecstasy was fantastic, everything after regardless of singer is meh. With the exception of the song Heaven and Hell. That's bad ass.
It depends which of their solo albums. I'd say the first two Ozzy albums were better than most of Dio's solo stuff, but that Dio's solo work was better than everything Ozzy did after Diary Of A Madman.
I also disagree on the Dio albums, naturally. For me, the best Sabbath album is Master of Reality, but Heaven and Hell is a close second.