Don't cop out with this nonsense. Answer the question. It's a legit question.If you have to ask, you won't understand.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Don't cop out with this nonsense. Answer the question. It's a legit question.If you have to ask, you won't understand.
1st Amendment allows people to be nice or be jerks and for each of us to respond with the speech we feel it warrants. This site allows some of that free speech and filters/blocks other free speech in an effort to keep the site (mostly) family friendly or at least PG-13. Some speech is outright prohibited and can get you banned. Until such a time as this site decides to filter the use of guitard, I'm guessing they find it no more offensive than other words whose connotation are soley negative (i.e., moron, idiot, etc.). Additionally, it makes this argument moot. I suppose a better approach than beseeching those who frequent TB would be to petition the moderators/site owners for a filter change.
If you can't explain then you don't have an argument.
No argument here, my friend. My experience doesn't bow to your opinion. Have a great day.
TRANSLATION: I got nothing, so I'll just lash out and then leave.No argument here, my friend. My experience doesn't bow to your opinion. Have a great day.
Don't be disingenuous, Clef. Anyone can tell the difference between something that's offensive and something that isn't. Even the anti-PC folks know the difference...they just don't care.I don't like this PC world we live in ... every words we can say as the potential to be offensive for someone.
TRANSLATION: I got nothing, so I'll just lash out and then leave.
My point is you or I can say whatever we like and others are free to respond in the manner they think it warrants. This includes holding people socially acountable for their speech. Freedom of speech does not imply freedom from consequence and not what I was trying to imply. My point (and I think you knew this) is that until this site chnages the filter/rules, this thread is kind of moot.That is not what the 1st amendment allows. The first amendment protects citizens from the government limiting your speech. People are free to be offended and hold people socially accountable for whatever they like.
Hey guys, let's make an effort not to have this thread flame out and get closed by the mods. I'm totally up for the argument because I think it's a legitimate one to have, but let's make sure to keep the punches above the belt.
Carry on.
How long until "intellectual disability" becomes offensive and non-PC, and a new term needs to be used so as not to "hurt" anyone?
P.S. Words can't really hurt anyone.
Bullcrap! They are THE most easily offended thin-skinned people out there.
Don't be disingenuous, Clef. Anyone can tell the difference between something that's offensive and something that isn't. Even the anti-PC folks know the difference...they just don't care.
Ha! Yeah, that's a more accurate translation for sure!Or, "I say a lot of offensive things, people get upset with me, and then I feel bad about myself. PC must be ruining America."
The "anti-PC" crowd is, by definition, not easily offended.
-
Irony alert.