Many here do not own a Z3 and there have been questions about the difference between it and the AB series, and why the Z3 cost much more. I don't think the Dingwall site explains any of this, but as you can see in these photos, the Z3 (on the left) body is in contact with the neck at a much higher point than the AB (which happens to be a 6 string). I think the idea is to have a longer contact area between the neck and the body to maximize wood tone, sustain and harmonic overtones. Also, notice the bridge on the Z3. It is countersunk into the body and bolted through the body (see the four bolds in the back?). This further integrates the fundamental acoustics of the instrument, including string vibration, sustain, and harmonic overtones. The bridge on the AB sits on top of the body (same with the NG2, although it has individual poles as opposed to the one piece AB bridge). Anyway, all this of involves more labor, time, and parts, hence the price difference. As far as the necks, they are both relatively thin and flatter compared to the NG2, which makes them easier to play in my opinion. They are both exceptional instruments. But if any of you are considering upgrading to a Z3 someday, I thought this would be helpful info.
View attachment 2950863
View attachment 2950865
View attachment 2950867
View attachment 2950869