• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dingwall Owners Club

I am really liking my Super P...

tb.jpg


But of course I'm now wondering what a Super P/J would be like. It's a sickness, I know.

sp5-pj-dark-candy-green-bwb-maple-maple-black-pearloid-blocks-e1.jpg
 
Is a PJ configuration of the SuperJ even an option anymore? All the photos on the website are showing either the 2x or 3x rounded shell pickups. And, has the bridge pickup moved to the '60s Jazz position? Do the newer versions have a P-Tone version pickup available in the rounded shells?

Mine is like Waltsdog's with the SuperFatty bridge pickup in '70s position. With the SJ5 (PJ) having the neck pickup about 1/4" closer the neck (than my SP5 (PJ)) and the SP having the bridge pickup in the '60s position - I prefer the sound of the older SJ5. The overall tone is beefier and even across the range. It is more noticeable on the D and G-strings as well; the SJ5 sounds fatter.
 
Is a PJ configuration of the SuperJ even an option anymore? All the photos on the website are showing either the 2x or 3x rounded shell pickups. And, has the bridge pickup moved to the '60s Jazz position? Do the newer versions have a P-Tone version pickup available in the rounded shells?

Mine is like Waltsdog's with the SuperFatty bridge pickup in '70s position. With the SJ5 (PJ) having the neck pickup about 1/4" closer the neck (than my SP5 (PJ)) and the SP having the bridge pickup in the '60s position - I prefer the sound of the older SJ5. The overall tone is beefier and even across the range. It is more noticeable on the D and G-strings as well; the SJ5 sounds fatter.
Thanks to the miracles of the P-Tone, a PJ is not sonically necessary. The SJ with a neck P-Tone solo'd fulfills the promise of the pickup's moniker quite remarkably.
 
The PJ is great and the extra pickup adds a lot of variety, but if it’s vatiety you want then look to the Super J with a P pickup as you can add a preamp etc.
Gratuitous picture for fun...

View attachment 3286821
No offence, but I have always preferred the P bass, but that's just me. ;) Since I've started playing through a Line 6 Helix tonal variety has never been an issue. :smug:
 
Thanks to the miracles of the P-Tone, a PJ is not sonically necessary. The SJ with a neck P-Tone solo'd fulfills the promise of the pickup's moniker quite remarkably.

That's what I thought. I guess it also splits the difference between the standard P pickup configuration and the reverse P seeing as it's all in-line (maybe split in the shell, but not as pronounced as the separate P pickup setup).
 
I am really liking my Super P...

View attachment 3286812

But of course I'm now wondering what a Super P/J would be like. It's a sickness, I know.

View attachment 3286810

A Super PJ is the best thing since sliced bread! The FD3 at the bridge adds a lot of versatility... although lately i’ve mostly been using the neck pickup solo.

I’ve tried several configurations of Supers in 4 and 5 strings. Honestly my favorite option is probably a maple fretboard. However I haven’t had the opportunity to play a wenge/wenge neck drool
 
That's what I thought. I guess it also splits the difference between the standard P pickup configuration and the reverse P seeing as it's all in-line (maybe split in the shell, but not as pronounced as the separate P pickup setup).
Split? They don't call it a P-Tone for nothin'!!
20190117_230827.jpg
 

Latest posts