Nope. Any reason why I would want to do this ?
The sound is good and even, so what would be the advantages to mess with this now ?
Naive question, I mean I always assumed that highest was best and that pickups could not saturate.
I could also play less hard, which is usually the case too but sometimes you get carried away by the music I guess
I don’t believe highest is best. You don’t want to bottom them out by any means but a little drop can clean up your sounds ALOT.
IIRC according to sheldons set up vids you want to be about an 1/8” down from bottom of string to top of pick up when you have the 24th fret depressed. This will give you closer to a 1/4” when string is open. Rough measurements of the top of my head so don’t quote these numbers.
Are you getting any string wear on the pick up covers?
Personally, I think Dingwalls, at least through my rigs are massive already. I found by lowering the pick ups ever so slightly that my signal became cleaner.
I think of it like this. When a vocalist “eats” the microphone he loses clarity but increases gain(?) driving the signal harder, creating peaks and “thickness”.
Sorry for some of my wording.
When they back off a bit they achieve better dynamics and control. The microphone has a better chance of picking up the dynamics of the voice. I’m sure this applies the same to pick ups. With that, In my mind you should experience less break up and over all a cleaner voice of the instrument.
BUT go too far though and some of the signal dynamics can get lost.
I’m not a sound engineer by any means. Despite leaning to the heavier side of music though, I’ve always tried to maintain a clean piano like tone.
FD3s are great for this especially when paired with a glockenklang.
I find the FDVs are easier to drive for aggression. Especially when paired with the DGTC.