Not really, IME. I did some tests on the B1K and it’s very flat except for a subtle roll off way up top that’s pretty musical. You can find those tests here: https://www.talkbass.com/threads/club-trickfish.1348946/page-27#post-24752522
I’m not an EMG expert but I do own two basses with EMGs (JVX and JAX respectively), and neither of them have as much content in the low mids as the FDVs. There are many other variables, so it’s not an apples to apples comparison, so take it with a grain of salt.
There’s a record producer in Vegas that calls me to lay down bass tracks a lot. Since getting my SJ he always, and I do mean ALWAYS, requests that I track the same way. Fresh rounds, middle pickup solo, EQ flat, and DI’d through a 1073. For that I run a Heritage Audio TT-73 straight to a MOTU 16A, which is just a bank of converters with no additional preamps. The result of that signal chain is always more abundant in the ~300hz range than any other bass I own. Cutting tracks for him again the night after making the switch and I immediately noticed less going on in the 300hz range, more down lower in the 80-100hz range, and a flatter presentation from about 800hz and up. Both the FDV and SF2 options present a dip centered around 500hz.
Thanks for the TF link. I’ll explore it soon.
I should not have assumed that your EMG jazz pups would have a relevant low mid presence as the humbuckers(DCs) do of course. I didn’t really think about that in comparison to the FDVs. You now have me really curious if you were to do these tests with the FD3s as well.
the comparison of the SF2s vs FDV makes perfect sense.

