TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Invalid Link Removed
Boom, there you go. My personal favorite are the stainless steel strings. The B string is a .130.
The Stock B is a .127 right? How different is the tension from the gauge/construction/etc?
My calipers have them at .127 (which also matches their FAQ on their site.) Why that doesn't match the strings they themselves sell is beyond me. Ill give the Paysons a try though. The free shipping puts them cheaper than Kalium.I believe the stock string is .130 as well. The Payson strings feel tighter to me. Very balanced and responsive. Definitely worth the try. The stock strings are good but Payson really feel and sound amazing. But that's just me!
I've heard such good things about these strings but I'm so completely happy with the dingwalls and the paysons are killer so I just don't know when I'll get around to trying them.
Edit: spelling
Are the B and E strings tapered on the Payson string sets?
Are the B and E strings tapered on the Payson string sets?
If you want a little more tension, the Payson nickel steel reduced core are the ticket. I really like them a lot!!My calipers have them at .127 (which also matches their FAQ on their site.) Why that doesn't match the strings they themselves sell is beyond me. Ill give the Paysons a try though. The free shipping puts them cheaper than Kalium.
My calipers have them at .127 (which also matches their FAQ on their site.) Why that doesn't match the strings they themselves sell is beyond me. Ill give the Paysons a try though. The free shipping puts them cheaper than Kalium.
It looks like the Reduced core has less tension than the standard Paysons, so I think I will go with the standard medium light nickels.If you want a little more tension, the Payson nickel steel reduced core are the ticket. I really like them a lot!!
The B, E, A and D strings are tapered on the PFNS-RC's and PFSS's.
PFNS-Medium Lights are tapered on the B, E and A Strings.
PFFlats are tapered on the B, E and A, no silk.
PFGWFlats are tapered on the B, E, A and D.
I could swear Payson said the reduced core had a bit more tension. They certainly seem a bit stiffer.It looks like the Reduced core has less tension than the standard Paysons, so I think I will go with the standard medium light nickels.
My setup for gig Sat night. Playing pic with other bass.View attachment 1103488
And it arrived, this thing is a behemoth with my Darkglass M900 and Fearful 12/6.View attachment 1107306
Also, what gauge/brand do you guys use for the low B? I can't say I am a fan of the tension on the current low B that came stock. I was looking at D'Addario's EXL165-5 (.135B) but it only says it supports up to 36.25 scale.
I could swear Payson said the reduced core had a bit more tension. They certainly seem a bit stiffer.
@Blues Cat Can we get a confirmation? I see that the reduced cores are heavier gauge (than the medium lights), is that the sole reason or just because is it because they have higher mass on the winding?...Maybe a combination of both.
I'm intrigued.
Thanks for the quick reply!The Payson Fanned NS-RC's have more tension than the PFNS-Medium Lights. Being a larger gauged string set has something to do with it, but mainly the reason is they have different core to wrap ratios.
@CL400Peavey, the B string would be too long on the medium scale Dingwalls.
Those that ordered over the Easter weekend, you should have them by Tues, no later than Wed.
@CL400Peavey, the B string would be too long on the medium scale Dingwalls.