• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Episode III

Akito said:
Sort of a SPOILER









I've got a question that really bugs me about this whole prequel thing and this movie in particular. How do the adult characters age so much in 18 years??? You're telling me Ewan ThaMcGregor becomes Alec Guiness in 18 years?t must be some hard livin'. And Luke's Uncle and Aunt go from fresh faced young farmers to shriveled bags in 18 years???
And Leia said she remembered her mother... from what, when she was one second old???
Dude thats obi wan after the hookers and booze :D
 
mz91 said:
I think everyones criticism does have weight.. But there is no perfect movie (i guess LOTR would come closest to perfection). But all in all considering the first 2 movies, AND the 3 classics. This was really really really good! I dont rember any memorable dialog in any of the starwars films.. Do you? The film's most quoted line is:

"Luke, i am your father."

This is probably the most ironic post I've ever seen, because that's not even how the line goes! Try: "No. I am your father."
 
abark000 said:
It you like great movies check out:

Memento
Heat
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
Taxi Driver
Cube
The Exorcist
Snatch

All have seemingly plausible storylines and no "deus ex machina" crap. All are wonderfully shot and written and the acting is top notch in everyone.
Are you saying LOTR was bad? :eyebrow: It has some of the best acting I've ever seen in it.
 
About the aging thing: there is one character that just doesn't make sense. Wedge! How the hell is he in this one?! Assuming he's 20ish here, 18 years from now would put him at 38, and 9 years after that (RoTJ) would put him at 47. That's just a *bit* older than he is in that movie, no? I just don't think he'd be that old. Maybe I'm wrong. I've got a couple other questions, if anybody realllllly nerdy wants to answer them, PM me so I don't spoil things.
 
Akito said:
Yeah I would say from your last line that you don't get it at all, and never will. When you get older will you play only classical music on the bass and will you feel sorry for bass players still playing the music they love even though they should be too old for it?

Come on bro. You pass that kind of judgement on me because I don't dig the Star Wars scene? Yikes.

Answering your question....first off, the comparison you came up with is sort of lame. But, if I see old men dressing up like members of Twisted Sister, Motley Crue, Winger, Ratt, or Poison when I am also an old man, than I would feel bad for them. If those same men want to play music from bands they enjoyed as younger men, I would not feel bad for them. I'm only 33, and listened to the bands I mentioned earlier in my teen years. I like to play music from some of those bands.

This is where the comparison doesn't work. Playing music, and acting like something make believe are way different. I'm not talking about people playing music. I am not laughing at these people because they like Star Wars and want to watch a long anticipated movie, I am laughing because these people are in their 40's and over running around in the rain dressed up like imaginary movie charaters acting like they are fighting with light sabers and pretend guns. What don't I "get"?

-Mike
 
MJ5150,

What you don't seem to get is that people are letting their hair down and having fun. Remember fun? Sometimes people act silly and stuff to have a laugh.

Whatever you do, don't find yourself at an SCA event or renaissance faire or *gasp! horror!* a showing of the Rocky Horror Picture Show. :)
 
Hmmmm..... It just seems more like an obsession that just having fun. I am sure these folks are having fun, but it appears to be more than that for the hardcore fans. However, I can understand your point. It's not like what I think about this is the absolute truth.

-Mike
 
I went to see it yesterday, and I must say, I was amazed.
Growing with the first episode, I was very curious for episode I, II and III. I was a bit of a dissapointment, it wasn't bad, but not really good either. II was a lot better, and II is definitely the best of the first trilogy (or second, it all depends on how you see it :) ).
I especially liked all the things that refer too the earlier trilogy, like spaceships that look like X-wings or Imperial shuttles, or Leia's ship in Episode IV.
And it's good to have a true villan back in the business, something we didn't really have in episode I and II
 
abark000 said:
They are simply the novels transformed into film and probably one of the best Book-to-Movie adaptations I've seen, but still they are just J.R.R. Tolkiens works.

I thought the LOTR series was a pretty LOUSY adaptation of perhaps the best fiction ever created... Peter Jackson happens to weed out scenes directly from the book so that he can keep his own scenes that go against the spirit of Tolkien's world. Ok, it was still a great film series, nonetheless.

I know this is a Revenge of the Sith thread, but I can't help it.
 
dees said:
I went to see it yesterday, and I must say, I was amazed.
Growing with the first episode, I was very curious for episode I, II and III. I was a bit of a dissapointment, it wasn't bad, but not really good either. II was a lot better, and II is definitely the best of the first trilogy (or second, it all depends on how you see it :) ).
I especially liked all the things that refer too the earlier trilogy, like spaceships that look like X-wings or Imperial shuttles, or Leia's ship in Episode IV.
And it's good to have a true villan back in the business, something we didn't really have in episode I and II

Uhhh... the Emperor IS the true villain. He was in both I and II. He just happens to be revealed to those who happen to have missed the original trilogy in episode 3.