And never in all my born days have I ever seen a more useless language, typographically speaking, than HTML. grump grump grump
A problem with HTML is that there are a lot of add-ons and libraries that add confusion.
I used to compose documents in TeX. Then they introduced LaTeX. There were no high level editors at the time, you wrote TeX code, much like BBCode used on some web sites. TeX allowed for massaging code at a low level, including fonts. The end result was well above what you could accomplish with the old standard, an IBM Selectric. But using TeX and a laser printer involved a lot of hair pulling.
I still sometimes resort to PostScript, another pain, when I want to do diagrams that I can’t seem to manage otherwise.
Last edited:
the photography side of the business.
.
!