• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Gibson ? or not Gibson Anyone recognise?

Both the Columbus and Avon (as well as most of these EB copies) have a 30.5" scale, not 32".
Eden Guitars usually have replacement short scale necks but I don't see any in stock right now. Maybe contact them for when they expect to get more.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr zee
avon by rose morris the neck might fit
Avon-Rose-Morris-Bass-Guitar-working.jpg
i think all these MIJ copy's are made in the same factory's :thumbsup:
 
I vote the Columbus, because of both the slot-screw pole-pieces and the knobs.

But it doesn’t have the notch in the pickguard for the palm rest. That’s what’s throwing me. They wouldn’t have taken that manufacturing step unless it was needed. Got the right looking bridge pup though. But that would be easily switchable.

But who knows. They’d change those models around to use whatever was available in the parts bins, so who knows? :wacky::cautious:
 
Yes no prob
Ouch!
Well, even if you plan to go headless you are faced with two issues:
  1. The truss rod adjustment is at the headstock end. You will need to get creative in finding a solution that will provide a string anchor with truss rod access. Something like this, if it will line up: 4 String Guitar Bridge for Headless Bass Guitar Black | eBay.
  2. Whether you go headless or rebuild the headstock, you will need to add a fair chunk of wood to be able to mount any of the hardware. It's definitely doable, though.
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
i think all these MIJ copy's are made in the same factory's :thumbsup:

Many of them were (at Matsumoku Industrial), which is why some of those 70's "lawsuit" copies are so good, across several brands.

Quite a few of them used bolt on necks, where the original had used a set (or through) neck ; which in the OP's case opens up some useful possibilities, and might work out cheaper than trying to salvage the original neck - assuming it's even straight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rollie 55
But it doesn’t have the notch in the pickguard for the palm rest. That’s what’s throwing me. They wouldn’t have taken that manufacturing step unless it was needed. Got the right looking bridge pup though. But that would be easily switchable.

But who knows. They’d change those models around to use whatever was available in the parts bins, so who knows? :wacky::cautious:

Absolutely! If we could accumulate one example of every variation on every make and model of these 70s copies, there would be more basses than what @bholder and @B-Mac have combined. What a pity it was so hard to obtain a gigable set-up on these instruments. There would be a lot more of them around.
 
Yes no prob
That looks pretty fatal to me, and we don’t even know if the truss rod works, state of the frets etc. Biding your time and looking for a replacement neck (someone here might even have one) would seem to be your best bet. The headless conversion thing, if it’s even possible with this model, would involve quite a bit of work and $$ I think. Alternatively, you could sell what you have or part it out to people who need what you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reedt2000