jive1
Commercial User
That doesn’t mean I am not going to challenge people that post *&^& and they don’t know what there talking about.
Example; When jive got taken to task with his remarks about the Beatles not being a live act. He probably read that after their final full concert at Candlestick Park in 66 they stopped performing live as the Beatles (for good reason) and focused more on recording.
But that was a small part of the picture. jive did not do his home work. He can stick with his position but he’s dead wrong and others did agree with me.
My Dad took me to The Shea Stadium Show in 65 after The Beatles had completed the filming of “Help” in the Bahamas. They were very live and very good and they didn’t have *&^& as far as sound technology was concerned.
BTW way Jung, that was one of the reasons John didn’t like performing live, we just didn’t have the technology to do it right in large festival venues. The technology while primitive started get better by 68-69. But you weren’t around then, were you? 
You're just confirming what I wrote. They stopped playing out in 66, and whether its because of technology or whatever, it doesn't change the fact that they only toured for 3 years with Ringo Starr. They may have been awesome to watch live, but it doesn't change the fact that the majority of their body of work was in the recording studio compared to the stage. Please point me to a live recording of a song from the White Album, Sgt Peppers, Magical Mystery Tour, Abbey Road by the Beatles. All arguably their most groundbreaking recordings.
Your personal experiences aren't going to change facts. Yes, I wasn't around back then, but it doesn't change the you still don't know crap (which has been verified in many threads, and confirmed by your own words). And like all old guys who can't deal with the facts, they pull out the old man card "You weren't there". Sorry, dude I'm not that old. Nothing I can do about it.

