While waiting for Aged Horse:
A speaker/cab system is designed around the assumption of the cone having a certain stiffness and the surround and spider having certain amount of compliance and resistance to movement so that it moves just the right amount within the gap of the magnet structure. When the cone creases like this it becomes more flexible and that ratio of compliance and resistance goes out of whack causing further damage to the coil. Also when the cone stops being stiff you lose low note amplitude because the cone no longer moves as single piston but moves differently in different places introducing distortion (IM?). Think of a canoe paddle. Which moves water more efficiently, the whole, stiff one or the one with a crack allowing it to flex? The part that flexes is no longer pushing water in the same direction as the rest. In a boat, you get to camp a little later and more tired. In air, the lack of coherence in the wavefront causes farty, indistinct fundamentals.
Mugre
Nicely said.
Hi,
Dumb question, but in this context, I'm not quite grasping the finer points of the word "geometry".
Would you mind elaborating what distinguishes "old" style speaker edge geometry, from "modern"?
The OP says this cabinet is from 2015, so what has changed in speaker design in the last 2 years, and why?
I personally don't own any drivers newer than the early 90's, and several of my cabs (with original drivers) are from the 60's, and 70's.
Whilst I've never had, nor encountered any of these problems ; forewarned is forearmed, and it would be beneficial to be aware of what's changing in the industry, and why - especially with regards to educating the musicians of tomorrow, so they don't cause any damage when they get a taste for vintage gear.
Thanks!
The cone edge geometry combined with the thickness(and material) of the cone itself is partly responsible for the mid voicing of the speaker.
There are 3 common cone edge geometries (I'm of course simplifying somewhat):
The oldest was where the bulk of the cone comes up at an angle and the cone itself makes an angle parallel to the mounting surface of the basket. In this geometry, the inside edge of the fabric surround is flat and glues to the cone parallel to the mounting surface of the basket. This was fine for low powered speakers, but as amps got larger, the fatigue where the cone itself makes the bend (change in direction from angled to flat) caused very high failure rates. This was made worse by the surround pulling and pushing on the cone edge under high excursion and eventually the weakened paper at the joint would collapse. These were typically of the accordion surround (also at one time called a C-66 surround, though I have no idea why)
The second oldest is similar, except that the angle is made in the fabric and not the cone itself. This is much more reliable, but suffers from the same cone pulling forces under high excursion conditions. Why not just make the cone thicker and stronger? Because the mid voicing will be greatly affected. The mid voicing, especially with overdrive effects, is easier to make nicer on an accordion surround, as it has a particular breakup effect but you better not overpower it. So this is a compromise between the older style and the newest style.
The newest is really based on what we learned in pro audio over maybe 30-35 years, but the MI industry is generally slower to adopt these improvements until absolutely necessary. In order to lineraize the surround motion, the M roll (and sometimes yo will see it as an inverted M) is used which helps to minimize the sideways forces on the cone edge. These are always (or I haven't seen examples otherwise) with the bend in the fabric matching the cone angle and the bond can be either on the top of bottom of the cone. Also, we are seeing examples of more advanced materials in cone construction which allow the cone to be stronger where needed (the farther out, especially with curvilinear cones, the greater this kind of stress) without getting heavier or negatively impacting tone.
All of the "super drivers" that I am familiar with use the newest construction technique, they tend to be better able to handle the mechanical stresses associated with the higher power and low frequency displacement. The improved linearity also help stabilize the VC in the gap under high displacement, and (typically) have lower distortion versus displacement, as well as improved damping and control of midrange reflections (appear as resonances) traveling through the cone and reflecting back off of the surround. Another advantage is greater excursion from a smaller diameter surround, allowing the Sd to increase somewhat.
Anytime a driver uses an accordion surround, care should be used to avoid mechanical damage under high excursion applications. This is one example where thermal power handling can often exceed mechanical power handling and why.
JBL was an early adopter of M roll geometry in low frequency drivers, but the bigger drivers by Faital, Eminence, B&C, 18 sound, RCF and others have migrated to the newest geometries.