Took me a second.
That's OK, I've obviously got nothing but time
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Took me a second.
The credits on their albums show them as the sole writer on some of their songs, including their biggest hits.
So, if neither of them played an instrument,
Haha yeah, sure. I guess "Billie Jean" would have been the same "iconic" song without that bassline.
Arrangement is a HUGE part of songwriting. Giving credit to whoever contributed would be the only fair and honest thing to do.
"The system" sucks hard.
FWIW: Wiki states that when Madonna started out in NYC she was a "drummer, guitarist, and vocalist in the rock bands Breakfast Club and Emmy", plus there are plenty of YouTube videos showing her playing guitar in some of her live performances.The credits on their albums show them as the sole writer on some of their songs, including their biggest hits.
So, if neither of them played an instrument, isn't it interesting that they got complete songwriting credit for just words and melody? I don't doubt that they probably provided enough melody and maybe even harmony, to suggest the correct chords for the musicians and producers. But I just think this is very interesting.
I remember reading about Boy George of Culture Club humming the hook from Karma Chameleon into a Fairlite and then the producer built the song around it using samples.
I feel very de-skilled as a musician around this kind of rubbish.
If you want to hear some hilarious stories about Madonna and Jacko's recording (as opposed to songwriting), I recommend Guy Pratt's book "My Bass and other Animals", in which he relates Jacko hid under the desk for the entire session and Madonna screeched "Time's money - and the money's mine!".Pat Leonard, after Trillion, worked for Zappa, and the Allman Brothers, then toured with Jackson as musical director. He wrote, recorded, and toured with Madonna for years, then formed Toy Matinee with Guy Pratt and Kevin Gilbert. He has since done more work with Madonna and other "A" list artists, too numerous to list here.
Elizondo is also a smokin' bassist.I have been in the music industry for my whole life, and my brother is a perfect example of where songs come from. He is a record publisher, and he seeks out young unknowns for their song writing skills, and puts them up at a computer and tells them to write music. Then he takes half of whatever the songs can make. This was true of Eminem's tune "The Real Slim Shady". While working with DR Dre, my brother found this 18 year old kid and promised him $30K per year to just write songs. Well, the kid came up with that song, they got Eminem to perform the tune, and the rest is history. My brother made 2 million for the publishing and the kid made 2 million for the writing. That kid was Mike Elizondo who now is well know in the music industry, but back then, he was just a punk off the streets. This is how so many artists get their songs. They do not write them. Unknowns often do. Those unknowns can rise the be major players if the stars align.
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t it the melody and lyrics that are what are copyrighted? So as long as they come up with those they can get full credit. I have also seen pics of them at piano or keyboard.The credits on their albums show them as the sole writer on some of their songs, including their biggest hits.
So, if neither of them played an instrument, isn't it interesting that they got complete songwriting credit for just words and melody? I don't doubt that they probably provided enough melody and maybe even harmony, to suggest the correct chords for the musicians and producers. But I just think this is very interesting.
Yeah, some people are just musically (as opposed to technically) talented - and playing an instrument may or may not have any bearing on that. One of the most gifted songwriters I know has zero notion of music theory. He can accompany himself on guitar but his main strength is that he can come up with catchy melodies like no one else I've ever worked with. It's incredible. He'll just come up with stuff on the spot, during a rehearsal or live show - whatever - and it'll be catchy. He can do the same with parts for instruments that he doesn't play. The guy's an idea factory in a way that even very developed instrumentalists often aren't.From about the same era as Michael Jackson and Madonna, I remember an interview with John Christ, back when he played for Danzig, and was asked how it works that Glenn is the writer but doesn't play an instrument. He said that a lot of it was Glenn calling him on the phone and humming riffs for him to transcribe, and sometimes Glenn would also bang out a few chords on guitar.
I've also worked with a singer who wrote songs on piano, and before she went to college she didn't know any theory. She once asked me what the chords to one of her songs were, because somebody wanted to cover it and asked for the chords. Kind of a variation on the same theme.
I've done a huge amount of arranging and orchestration, and that may contribute mightily to a hit recording, but it's not really all that integral to writing the song, sorry.
When I think of Billie Jean in my head I sure ain't hearing some bassline (can't even think of it at the moment unless I were to bring it up on YouTube), I'm hearing the lyrics and the melody that goes with them.Yeah, this pretty much, whether one likes it or not. You could even say, and I might, that not only is arrangement not integral to composition, but the composition is precisely that thing that remains recognizable when pretty much all the original arrangement is changed or replaced. The composition, in other words, does not depend on an arrangement but, in fact, survives rearrangement.
Imagine a guy playing "Billie Jean" in a coffeehouse using just an acoustic guitar and his own voice. No drums, no bass, no background vocals, no slinky electric rhythm guitar, no strings, not even any MJ hoo-hoos. He's not even trying to suggest the bass riff, just playing chords. But he's singing the right words with the right melody (allowing a little room for interpretation), reasonably competently. Would we still recognize the song? Yeah, we would. That's the composition right there--the element that allows you to recognize the song even in a totally different arrangement. It doesn't matter in the slightest which arrangement was "original," or which one we like best; the composition is the composition, and the arrangement is the arrangement.
I think I read somewhere that if you had Celine Dion record a song you wrote, you had to hand over 50% of the writing credits.