Nope, that's just the maximum resolution....Wait, is the iTrack FIXED at 24bit/96khz ??
The limitations in IOS are in software. IIRC, some apps are fixed at 16/48.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nope, that's just the maximum resolution....Wait, is the iTrack FIXED at 24bit/96khz ??
Thanks. That helps.The earliest models you want to look at are the mid 2009 13.3" Core2Duo aluminum MacBook Pro's. They have Firewire support, run in true 64-bit mode without any trickery, and can be updated all the way to Mavericks, OS X 10.9. These little guys are widely available, have great battery life, can be upgraded with SSD's and lots of RAM in the aftermarket, and make a solid basis for a laptop audio package.
Because of continuing teething pains with various audio apps and Mavericks, I would personally get off the bus at OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion).
Wow! Really?Unfortunately I am now awaiting my 3rd sonic port as the first one died after 2 days and the 2nd one had some persistent static.
Has anyone used both the Focusrite iTrack Solo and the Sonicport?
I had the Apogee Jam and it sounded AWESOME, but was frustrated with trying to get my little practice space setup using the headphone jack on the ipad. So, the sonic port seemed great since I could do it right on the device. Unfortunately I am now awaiting my 3rd sonic port as the first one died after 2 days and the 2nd one had some persistent static.
The focusrite is now down to $104 at B&H so I am wondering if I should just go for that over the sonic port? I realize its bulkier but will it sound better?
I'm also wondering what my options are for running the focusrite to a lightning port ipad since it doesn't come with the necessary cable? It seems I will also need to extend the packed in cable as its only a few inches long.