• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

Realised I forgot a photo of the 55-94
sooo... this is interesting.

My new to me 1999 Lakland 55-94 sounds ok, but something is happening in the mids which make it feel very dark. The setting on the mid control I find a bit off... set to the higher settings and boosting it begins to add in some of what I feel like is missing... but for a nice finger style sound I prefer the 250 or 500 boost.
This "darkness" isn't just me as other people seem to say the same thing and there's a whole load of pickup and preamp swapping....
I’m not sure I want to do any pickup swapping on this bass AND I know I typically really like that “bartolini” sound anyway!

Anyway my blend pot (50k mn) isn't working properly.... Hard to find in the UK with the whole of Europe locked down, but I can get a 250k mn blend pot.

Now passive single coil pickups in fender basses.... normally have 250k pots. A 500k pot sounds 'brighter'... and I think it's due to it interacting with the pickup and starting the natural top end roll off later or something... so I was expecting the 250k pot to slightly change the tone...

Well it has! First thing I noticed was a very slight single coil hum. I'll need to check the connections but I'm pretty sure that's new - but the nicest thing is seems to have opened up the sound a bit.
The neck pickup is very much more P sounding with a little more high mids openness. so that's one good thing.

The bridge pup bridge coil is more like a jazz bridge pup, in dual coils it's a little more open but it doesn't make much of a difference.

The middle 'jazz' setting is darker again and more like the other blend pot (which makes sense as electronically there's less difference with both pups at 100%) but it's a nice difference.
Another thing I noticed is that the low notes on the B string and E string would get a bit wooly sounding. Especially with the neck pup there would be a lack of difinition.. They now sound a lot cleaner and clearer now.
Had to go through the preamp options again, settled on 500k as a nice compromise between a "better" tone and what I like. The mid control still seems crazy powerful but it's good.

I also straightened the truss rod... and it plays so nicely. I also think the last three weeks I've got used to 5 strings more as I didn't get as much of a "oh this feels like home" picking up a 4 string.

So yeah - a £4 pot and it's opened up the sound somewhat!

this being Talkbass I should probably add a slight caveat - I think the original system was a fairly tuned circuit and was a balance of compromises got at through years of R&D - there was a certain baked in tone to the 55-94 originally that can only have been deliberate. Lakland knew what they were doing- but as a first stage of moving away from that tone this pot change has left me quite happy.
 
So the last several posts have had me listening to some samples of a guy playing a Scheff to some songs, and the tone reminds me of a Gibson EB-0 with a jazz agression from the bridge pup. I dig it!
Yeah, this Incubus concert was my first exposure to a Scheff bass. So cool. Such a tight, burpy bridge PU sound!!
 
Lakland's dang B-stock email is tempting me right now. Relatively inexpensive ice blue 44-64 Customs (laurel and maple), 55-02 Custom (maple), and 55-60 Custom (laurel) with gig bag for $500-$600 off. Also have a HB-30 for pennies.

Somebody please buy these so I don't!

Yup...I know... Thank goodness the 4464 isn't a 5564!!!

That she is purdy!
 
Yup...I know... Thank goodness the 4464 isn't a 5564!!!

That she is purdy!

There would have been no plea if it was the elusive 55-64! There's a US one in the classifieds right now but I can't justify the spend with gigs still getting cancelled left and right. Plus, my wife won't let me sell any of our children...;)
 
anyone looking for a DJ5? A local store to me dropped a price of one they've had in stock a few years to less than what used go for: Lakland Skyline DJ-5 Swamp Ash | DeGeorge Bros. Guitars | Reverb

I've personally played the bass and it's perfect action. Effortless to play.
So here is the bass, got it for a REALLY great price, HOWEVER, I nee there was going to be some issue with the neck because the ad photos skirted around it. Anyway as you see in the following photos the neck had to be shimed also the outside edge sticks out a bit and there's no adjustment in the front pickup, other than that it plays and sounds really great, trying to decide if I'm going to keep it...
20200512_161321.jpg
20200512_161321.jpg
20200512_161337.jpg
20200512_161417.jpg
20200512_161449.jpg
 
So here is the bass, got it for a REALLY great price, HOWEVER, I nee there was going to be some issue with the neck because the ad photos skirted around it. Anyway as you see in the following photos the neck had to be shimed also the outside edge sticks out a bit and there's no adjustment in the front pickup, other than that it plays and sounds really great, trying to decide if I'm going to keep it...
View attachment 3826596 View attachment 3826596 View attachment 3826598 View attachment 3826599 View attachment 3826600

I've always had to shim fender style basses, but I totally understand what you mean. I'm sure they'll take care of you if you decide to return. they've always been good to me
 
I sent my US 44-64 to Lakland in February for a little work, and all non-essential businesses had to shut down right before it was finished... Unfortunate timing. I just got it back yesterday, so I’ve been playing it non-stop today, after being without it for a few months. I agree with the many people who say that Lakland makes the best necks in the business. I don’t know what it is about their neck profiles that make them feel so good, but it’s perfection.
4CA7B2CF-20AD-4763-A857-3A60C48CA517.jpeg
 
I agree with the many people who say that Lakland makes the best necks in the business. I don’t know what it is about their neck profiles that make them feel so good, but it’s perfection.
View attachment 3830895

If we knew that... It wouldn't be the magic that it is!

I would agree that pretty much every Lakland I picked up the neck was awesome.

However there was one out there that was better than any one I've ever played in my life.

A few others had the privilege of playing it as well.

It was a 4460 (Joe Osborn at the time) that Carl Pedigo was building for Adam Clayton.

That thing was crazy and felt awesome....

It didn't just play itself...it sang and danced as well!..

Even Carl wasnt sure why it had so much mojo...

Adam ended up not liking it...long story.... But I guess he kept the neck....
 
If we knew that... It wouldn't be the magic that it is!

I would agree that pretty much every Lakland I picked up the neck was awesome.

However there was one out there that was better than any one I've ever played in my life.

A few others had the privilege of playing it as well.

It was a 4460 (Joe Osborn at the time) that Carl Pedigo was building for Adam Clayton.

That thing was crazy and felt awesome....

It didn't just play itself...it sang and danced as well!..

Even Carl wasnt sure why it had so much mojo...

Adam ended up not liking it...long story.... But I guess he kept the neck....

Was that the one with a certain paint job? I still remember the look on Dan's face when we brought in Radioactive Oatmeal, and he said "THAT would've gotten us in the Coke commercial".
Lol
 

Latest posts