Thanks for the input. I am leaning towards the hookers and drugs option this morning.

Bluesy, as an experienced Acme guy I take it you think Blondie is as good or better than B-2's?
Yes, I do so far; but I'm not ready to get rid of my Acmes yet. In fact, I plan to get a pair of Andy's new neo 1x12s and sell at least one B-2.
I pump 700-800 watts@ into my Low B-2s and I get
plenty of volume from them, too. In fact, I've successfully used a single Low B-2 outdoors more than once. The Acmes are naturally voiced closer to my particular tone preference than my fEarful, so I can achieve my tone from the Acme with less EQ fiddling than the I can from Blondie. (This may change, however, as I become more familiar and gain more experience with my relatively new--to me--Eden VT-300 and Genz-Benz Shuttle 9.0.)
The Low B-2s are actually heavier than the larger-footprint fEarful 15/6, and I've always hated the handle configuration of the Low B-2s. Thankfully Andy is finally fixing that.
Mrs. Bluesy is very supportive of my music and doesn't complain about the dollars invested; but we're supposed to be downsizing for a move to an empty-nesters residence, so I'm trying operate under a "move-one-out-before-you-bring-another-one-in" rule. As a result, at least one Low B-2 and the Berg HTs will probably go to make room for a 12/6Cube and maybe another 15/6.
To me, if you like the unparalleled lows and limited mids and highs of the Acme, and are satisfied with the limitations inherent in that voicing, you'll continue to like them. If you prefer a broader-ranged response, with capabilities for the mids and highs that are equal to the significant lows, you'll probably prefer the fEarfuls. At the moment, I'm convinced I can't live without both!