The one thing I've learned from my (admittedly more limited than your) observations and experiences is that, people who don't own their **** can't fix their ****.
We used to tell the clients something along those lines.
This is where we disagree. For me, if you make a choice that has a probable consequence that you've been warned about in advance, you choose the consequence - and the responsibility for all that follows from that - when you make the choice.
I get what you're saying on this, but the problem is addiction is primarily a psychological issue. As I said earlier, the brain rewires itself. You don't choose to become an addict, but you do choose to continue to use the drugs & alcohol.
I know it sounds like a paradox, but what the addict doesn't know how to do is change their thought process to live a life without drugs & alcohol. What the counselors do, is provide them with the tools they need to help them stay off those things.
Technically speaking, addiction is incureable. This is why once you're an addict, you're always an addict. . You could be in recovery for a decade or more, but if you have that one drug or drink, you could and more than likely will go into relapse. All too often people think "I've got this crap beat" and have a drink/drug and they're right back to square one again. Including the old behaviors to obtain the drug.
Addicts are a whole different category, and, yes, they deserve compassion and help to get back on their feet, not the ridiculous notion of a shotgun in the face zombie-style. But they also deserve to be presented with the bill at the end of the process. If someone falls into a hole and breaks a leg, the person who dug the hole is normally presented with the medical bill.
I'm not sure if I'm fully understanding what you're getting at in the later part of your paragraph. Those in treatment do have to pay a bill. They don't get a free ride. Granted in some places insurance will help cover some of the costs of a residential treatment program, but most outpatient facilities I know of don't take insurance. Part of the logic behind that is it helps teach them financial responsibility. Personally, if they ever mandated drug testing for welfare, they should also implement mandatory, low cost/subsidized counseling as a stipulation for obtaining it or at least to remaining on it.
Jail has to be around as a last resort, but I agree with you that it's not a desirable outcome, either for the addict or for society. If someone can undo their mistake and get a firm grasp onto the bottom rung of the ladder and start climbing again, everyone wins and a life is saved.
I salute you for your work helping that happen.
I agree with you 100% on this.
Fortunately, more and more counties are implementing drug courts for the very reasons you mentioned. IIRC, the idea behind it is, if you weren't on drugs or addicted to them, then you more than likely wouldn't have done what you did to put yourself in that situation.
The only problem per say with incarceration is, they don't provide you with treatment. It's just a place to detox and punish. Without the aid of treatment, the addict will come right back out of jail and repeat their old behaviors. Unless they implement treatment programs in the jails/prisons the problem is not really getting fixed. Remember, with addiction you will still seek out and engage the substance/behaviors regardless of any negative consequences they have.
Not saying this is how you think, but many people have the misconception that detoxification is treatment and because someone detoxed they will kick the habit. It doesn't work that way.