OK trying for brevity here but I will probably fail. I'm writing because I'm super frustrated with a friend who on one topic has always been clueless and I thought maybe some of you could assist.
I'm an amateur player in a couple of bands. Many years ago I was taking lessons while I was in a jazz standards band that played small events from time to time. I asked my teacher what we should be charging and he was adamant that we accept no less than union scale. The idea was that giving it away or playing for cheap is terrible for working musicians. I have since heard the same thing from many people who make some or all of their living as musicians. And I've quit bands after playing free gigs (for charity, for example) where everyone else gets paid - the florists, the caterers, the bartenders, the venue, etc. I don't mind playing a charity gig for free as long as everyone else is giving it away too. Otherwise, music ain't free.
My BEST friend, oldest friend, plays drums and we have been playing together for many years, and he loves playing as I do, but he's always willing to play for free and grudgingly will get us gigs that pay $100 a guy, whatever. (The last bar gig I played, with a different band, we all agreed to donate the proceeds to charity... none of us needs $100.)
OK so my drummer pal just told me he wants to play Saturday night at the end of the month at a private party for people who want to have a blow out party before they do a "massive reno" (his words) on their house. And he's going to play for free but will "try" to get us $100. For my $100 I will have to haul, set up, and tear down not only my bass rig but a PA and mics on Saturday night. I'll have help at the venue but ultimately will be loading and unloading. Let's not get into how bad the traffic in Toronto is... especially on Saturday night.
I'm only going to quote one of his texts (and this is a guy I have known for 49 years:
"Watch how quickly I jump at any chance to play live and I'm lugging a poopieload more gear than u...If I get some $ out of it great but I'm not a jobber and I'm not a pro by a long shot so I don't have the same attitude about playing music as u...it's kinda sad"
(he does go on to insult me multiple times, which IS what's sad to me because we are such good friends and it's not like I haven't told him what I think many times).
Anyway, what do you fellow low-enders think?
My .02/what's worked for me:
One of life's valuable lessons I've latched onto is how to say "no" to someone politely and succinctly. No further explanation is necessary, especially if it just gives that person talking points to argue against.
Which is part of the bigger life-lesson I've latched onto,
that I only hold sway over my own thoughts, feelings and actions,
not yours or your friend's.
That your friend doesn't fully understand how to disagree without making it personal is just one example of something I would have no control of, nor interest in controlling or changing.
I simply don't have to accept every invitation to argue. Fortunately for me, most of the time I find I'd rather have some peace of mind. Not my monkeys, not my circus.
What I would do in your situation going forward is
simply not work the freebies, offering "thanks but no-thanks", and leaving it at that. In your case, that would be a self-evident response, since your friend now knows how you feel about working freebies. No value in further discussion.
And if he were my friend and were to start pushing my buttons again, I'd refuse to further engage or respond. People tend to stop arguing quickly when they're the only one on stage. Silence can be an effective tool here. If I'm tempted to respond, I might even remind myself that his inability to not take stuff personally is on him, and that I owe no one free rent in my head.
Last night I was on the phone with my brother, who likes to argue conspiracy and politics. In the past, we'd be off to the races with a pointless and exhausting argument where I'd fiercely imply his delusions on multiple levels. Last night I simply had to say, "You're starting in on a subject you think we're going 9 rounds on. We're not."