TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's called a spin.. Mate.. I good designer.. Does both what they ask and what looks good.. So there's the answer.. To your question..I think it’s more likely that the brief said specifically not to stray too far from the original.
I imagine many people were involved in this decision. Not to mention, how much has to be changed throughout the company, let alone in actual instrument production? Signs, letterheads, cards, PowerPoint logos, store displays...
All for a change which may likely make absolutely no difference whatsoever to anyone considering buying one of their instruments. I mean, you have to look closely to see the difference.
A graphic designer I follow on Twitter posted yesterday that Fender just had her update the Squier logo.
View attachment 4946524
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
That's exactly what I say about Sire basses.I had to look at it for a while before I spotted the difference. That may be more of a reflection of me than it though. But what if other people hate it?
Salesperson: "So what do you think?"
Traditionalist dude; "Sounds great, tight neck pocket and I like how the tuners seem pretty solid and the fit and finish is great. Not too heavy, love the neck. Most comfortable bass I've played in ages.
And that's pretty cheap. Thinking I could gig this and keep the Nash/MIA Fender/G&L/(insert name here) at home when I do festivals and street gigs. But that logo is just a deal breaker..."
Nah; can't see that happening too often...