- May 16, 2007
- 3,395
- 4,869
- Disclosures
- Volunteer developer/beta tester with Source Audio, Morningstar Engineering & MORTRIX
It isn’t. It’s “gazzajagman”. Roger’s link above will get you there though.I think it's GMC...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It isn’t. It’s “gazzajagman”. Roger’s link above will get you there though.I think it's GMC...
I have both and like the way Neuro works on Aftershock for tailoring sounds, so far I have about 2 dozen for guitar and bass. I have not found the Ultrawave so easy to recreate popular models but GMC's approximations are very good. I use the Ultrawave for more exotic sounds as well as the huge potential for compression, EQ and clean sounds.Here’s a question I started to think of messing around with presents.
Does the ultrawave bass obviate the need for a shockwave? Can it produce all the sounds that the shockwave can?
Lol, should have known..It isn’t. It’s “gazzajagman”. Roger’s link above will get you there though.
Agreed on these points. I know this seem simple, but changes to firmware messes with everything these days: testing programs, all 4 editor/app platforms, user guides, etc.This note was mentioned on my "SA Mod Squad" thread. But it seems like it belongs in the SA megathread as well.
In one of the SA explainer videos (One Series Pedals: A Grand Overview) Jeff states that the three mod pedals, Mercury, Lunar, and Gemini, "are essentially all the same pedal, just with a different paint job".
This is true but for one important difference. The knob assignments are different for each pedal. And you cannot change them in the Neuro editor. I chose the Gemini because I wanted the MIX and TONE controls.
I wish SA would do an update for the pedals to allow those lower two knobs to be reassigned. I'd also like to see a triangle wave added to the shapes, but I won't hold my breath on that one.
A big multi effects unit is not on our road map.Is there a plan for a more robust “all in one” type platform for the future? Something for those of us not afraid of using tech to get set up?
mid love a multi-effect platform where I can load all my pedals and then set presets not just for the effect settings, but complete scenes with the ability to reorder things. Adding a couple effect loops would be a nice touch for us ampless users who want our profilers inserted, or the occasional analog effect in the chain.
I have almost all the series one pedals now, so I’m not in a big hurry. Just curious if that’s in the future.
Also if you guys get into AI profiling, it could be an awesome single unit setup for ampless gigs with the right routing and outputs.
I run several of my SA pedals in loops of my Morningstar ML10X. I even give the Spectrum and C4 a second loop each so I can insert anything into their own internal loops.But adding a Neuro Hub to a loop switcher would be a pretty boss setup.
@LowWay, You could look at getting a loop switcher thingy. That’ll give you quite a bit of flex with order, bypass scenes, etc. Some offer more options than the neuro hub.
I run several of my SA pedals in loops of my Morningstar ML10X. I even give the Spectrum and C4 a second loop each so I can insert anything into their own internal loops.
We are giving this great thought and attention. Keep an eye out for Neuro 3.0.I have 2 of them.
Im not complaining. Just curious about the roadmap. With things like iRig, and phones and tablets that are now more powerful than laptops and desktops were not long ago, it seems like a small powerful platform might be in the future. I’m just hoping as things shift, SA is there as their quality is top notch.
We are giving this great thought and attention. Keep an eye out for Neuro 3.0.
It has cost us more R&D$ than 1.0 + 2.0. Its all the obvious improvements and so much more.Out of interest can you give us any hints on how Neuro 3.0 is going to be better than we have now?? Obviously most of us are used to working with what we have now and I wonder if it is going to be a real paradigm shift forward or just a few tweaks?
Its not about balking or being lazy. Its about keeping track of thousands of little details, and that is very difficult. Its 11PM on a Friday night and I am worried about what is not perfect.I hope the terminology is clear and consistent-- and in cases where it's inconsistent with the manual, choose the better terminology and change the manuals as needed.
If anyone balks at editing the manuals, remind them how many fewer support emails and threads you'll have to respond to.
Its not about balking or being lazy. Its about keeping track of thousands of little details, and that is very difficult. Its 11PM on a Friday night and I am worried about what is not perfect.