• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stoner/Doom Bassists Thread, Part 90: Maxed Out

I see a Fender Bassman 300 on sale locally. Anyone played one?
If youre talking about the Fender 300 Pro with the open metal grill it is the most badass beautiful and flexible amp you will ever buy. I will never sell mine and may pick up a spare. If you mean the Fender Superbassman 300, its pretty cool and sounds great... it cant hold a candle to the 300 Pro though.
 
300T while designed by an ampeg guy is still a modern fender and has a ton of non tube componentry in the audio path that make it sound not very tubey at all compared to an SVT or vintage Sunns.

I couldnt disagree more. The graphic, blendable second channel, and compressor can all be defeated and then its running Input>bass/treble eq>power stage. I think its just what a tube amp should respond like but has more headroom than any other 300 ive played. Plus, when you engage the extra options they do what they are suppposed and add their touches, but dont compromise the tubey-ness at all. There is a world of tube tone difference between it and the rackmount 1200 solid state version. I couldnt be happier with it.

The new Mesas on the other hand... those dont sound tubey to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Korladis
I couldnt disagree more. The graphic, blendable second channel, and compressor can all be defeated and then its running Input>bass/treble eq>power stage. I think its just what a tube amp should respond like but has more headroom than any other 300 ive played. Plus, when you engage the extra options they do what they are suppposed and add their touches, but dont compromise the tubey-ness at all. There is a world of tube tone difference between it and the rackmount 1200 solid state version. I couldnt be happier with it.

i hated the 2nd channel and could not get a good thick sound out of it without the graphic EQ. the amp just had no sag and response that i want from a tube amp.

it still sounded good but not what i consider tube good
 
Didn't know he ever played 5 string. He didn't when I saw them at the end of March.


I didn't want to 'like' this comment. But I feel your pain. Been there, done that. I'm trying !
He mostly uses it in Om, guess he wanted to break it out.

He is playing the 5 that just came out from Ric. Apparently he is the 1st person on earth to get one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Korladis
i hated the 2nd channel and could not get a good thick sound out of it without the graphic EQ. the amp just had no sag and response that i want from a tube amp.

it still sounded good but not what i consider tube good
I can get a hellaciously thick sound with mine, But I did find that's it's a very responsive amp to different tubes and some have been less full bodied in it. Nothing compared to the winged CS.
I only experience sag at very high volumes, which is what I'd expect given its headroom. I love its quick lush response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Korladis
Speaking of DOD has anyone seen the 250 in stock anywhere for the blowout prices?

I have not seen any in a while, I picked up a few early on during a stupid deal of the day for $50 3-4 years ago at least.

I bought an Ampeg PF-50T new a while ago, but it was on clearance. Most of my pedals now I've bought new.

I think also partly it's that a lot of companies just currently don't make what we want.

I kinda flip flop, but I tend to agree with you about the current equipment releases. There are a lot of small shop stuff that fits the bill though.

That and how a lot of older stuff, like many Peavey amps, have real unique voices. I admit I like quirky, unique old stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Korladis
Never gelled with the Boneshaker, but have upwards of 30 DOD FX Series pedals. 40+ if you count duplicates.

Never tried the Gunslinger on bass, but it’s fantastic on guitar. I use it for a doomy, Iommi-esque tone. It’s set similar to my FatMetal, but is a little less full-bodied and a bit grindier than the FatMetal, though I could likely make the FatMetal sound identical.

For $30, I’ve been contemplating a second Gunslinger. Interested to hear your thoughts on bass.

That's a hell of a collection! I've yet to try one personally, but a lot of guys I know gig with many of the FX series and love em. Trying em out is on my massive pedal bucket list.
 
I couldnt disagree more. The graphic, blendable second channel, and compressor can all be defeated and then its running Input>bass/treble eq>power stage. I think its just what a tube amp should respond like but has more headroom than any other 300 ive played. Plus, when you engage the extra options they do what they are suppposed and add their touches, but dont compromise the tubey-ness at all. There is a world of tube tone difference between it and the rackmount 1200 solid state version. I couldnt be happier with it.

The new Mesas on the other hand... those dont sound tubey to me.
I like the Strategy but not the Prodigy.

I'd love to try a 300Pro/300T eventually.

i hated the 2nd channel and could not get a good thick sound out of it without the graphic EQ. the amp just had no sag and response that i want from a tube amp.

it still sounded good but not what i consider tube good
Not everyone wants much sag, even from tube amps.

I have not seen any in a while, I picked up a few early on during a stupid deal of the day for $50 3-4 years ago at least.



I kinda flip flop, but I tend to agree with you about the current equipment releases. There are a lot of small shop stuff that fits the bill though.

That and how a lot of older stuff, like many Peavey amps, have real unique voices. I admit I like quirky, unique old stuff.
Yeah, definitely. My Hex amp should be coming soon, and I bought that... newer than new, really, since it didn't exist yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Novarocker
That's a hell of a collection! I've yet to try one personally, but a lot of guys I know gig with many of the FX series and love em. Trying em out is on my massive pedal bucket list.
If I was unaware of “boutique” pedals, the FX Series would have all my needs covered. As it is, there are a few of them whose tones/utility no one has ever duplicated. They’re affordable, great sounding, and last forever (with a little TLC). I could easily gig my FX boards, and no one would ever think they sounded “bad”. Many people listen with their eyes and pocketbooks, but not ears!

Of course, this is for my guitar board, and I’ve found I’m much less picky on guitar dirt and tones. They still sound good on bass, but the dirt tones aren’t as good. I’m really picky about bass dirt. But as for the BiFET, Deep Freeze, FX25B, FX90 Delay, and Classic Fuzz, those can easily hang with my boutique bass pedals.
 
If you engage the EQ and set it flat it has no influence on the tone... Its a powerful EQ so adjust very sparingly at first. I like to give a small bump at 100hz and maybe 250, cut the 30hz a bit.. and give a smidge at 1.5k. Gives me alot of heft without the bloated lows and a touch of clank.
Yeah. I'm not a purist about my tube amps. As long as the power amp is tubes, I don't really care if the front end has some solid state stuff. I use the graphic EQ on my D-180 with Catapult.

If I was playing a 300T/300Pro, I'd probably leave the compressor off, and maybe use the graphic EQ. And turn up the gain obviously.