sorry hit post without adding the SmileySure, because both subsidiaries are both so hands off...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
sorry hit post without adding the SmileySure, because both subsidiaries are both so hands off...
No problem. I added the "sarcasm off"!sorry hit post without adding the Smiley![]()
Dude, your sound would be better if you didn't mix cabs, bruh.My argument for mixing cabs (4x10 and 1x15):
In my 17 years of playing, no one has ever said to me "Dude, your sound would be better if you didn't mix cabs, bruh."
End of debate.
Indeed. Another thing with a cab like that... if you are getting it mic'd up into the PA... which do you mic? The 10" or the 15"? This is another, albeit minor, reason to use a matching set of drivers.I would say anyone with at least half their hearing would choose any of Mesa's other big cabs over that. Easily one of the worst sounding cabs I have played through.
They're trying to sell cabs. The SVT-15E is a great little cab, but IIRC, handles only around 200 watts, which is way less than the SVT-410HE.Mixed cabs - Here is what Ampeg says on their web site about the SVT-15E speaker cab: "Team it up with the SVT-CL head and an SVT-410HE, for top-end, and you’re guaranteed to get the dance floor moving". and, about the SVT-410HE cabinet: " The Ampeg SVT-410HE is also the ideal enclosure for the player who wants to add extended upper register clarity to a system that already features ample low frequency performance. Just ask George Clinton—he uses an SVT-410E to round out the top-end of his killer, all-SVT stage setup"......... Sooooo... are Ampeg's comments legit or are they just trying to sell cabinets (or maybe both?)
It's NASA.LOL, and you have a link to a pro-climate change site. Really?
Yeah, and personally, whether it's the study of the atmosphere or of acoustics, if many people who have made it their life's work to study a particular topic reach a consensus about it, I pay attention and give them some credit.True, but not at the rate it's been changing over the last 20 years. When I was a kid, 100 degree days in my area of Florida in summer were rare. Today they're commonplace. And for two winters in a row, my city didn't have a single freezing day, and we always get a few. I don't say this as a political statement, either. To me it's got zip to do with politics. I will agree with you that it's hard to prove 100%, but I'd rather err on the side of caution.
It's NASA.
I attempted to find the sound I was hearing in my head for years.
It didn't just disappear on its own. Flourocarbons in aerosol cans were banned and it fixed itself in time.I think that is a watch list word.
now the guys have to read this whole horrible thread lol.
poor government
hey wasn't there a huge hole in the atomsphere that magically disappeared.
The hole in the ozone layer gradually decreased after the substances causing it were banned, as Jimmy said.I think that is a watch list word.
now the guys have to read this whole horrible thread lol.
poor government
hey wasn't there a huge hole in the atomsphere that magically disappeared.
I think that is a watch list word.
now the guys have to read this whole horrible thread lol.
poor government
hey wasn't there a huge hole in the atomsphere that magically disappeared.
Yeah, and personally, whether it's the study of the atmosphere or of acoustics, if many people who have made it their life's work to study a particular topic reach a consensus about it, I pay attention and give them some credit.
.
hey wasn't there a huge hole in the atomsphere that magically disappeared.
I know the difference. It was better, not louder.Because it was louder. Our brains tend to interpret louder as "better" and "fuller."
Next you're going to tell us that the world is flat.Follow the money