• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Official MARUSZCZYK CLUB!

Don't have the series position anymore as I rewired it coil1/parallel/coil2 but am planning to do the coil1/series/coil2 wiring as I don't like the parallel position either on its own or combined with the P (and the series position is the only one with enough lows to rival those of the P pickup). Will try my best to come up with some samples. Still there was no major difference in volume back when factory wired (series/parallel/coil1), just EQ sounds radically diverse: series is more bassy, parallel is brighter and single is in-between (front coil -further apart from bridge- is ballsier). I use P+humbucker's back coil (closest to bridge) for a J-like tone. And use the front coil (mixing some P for added lows) to get a Musicman like tone (the amount of P varies, less for fingerstyle, more for picking). P tone is definitely more convicing when switching the push/pull in the volume knob to passive. The thing with the coil tap switch is that it's just that, therefore you're subject to the things that naturally happen when changing impedance (parallel getting thin, series getting bassy). In Musicman basses you switch from one to another position and there's not that much EQ mismatch (altho' timbre changes noticeably) so you don't have to reach for the amp to adjust, can be changed mid-song no problem. I think they have a preset EQ for each position in the electronics. Delano's electronics don't allow for that, the switch goes before any electronics and outputs to the volume knob.
 
Last edited:
Thanks.
The reason I ask is that I have been playing around with tapping coils on MM style pickups for a while, and actually installed switches in my '94 stingray to yield all possibilities - parallel/north coil/south coil/series. There wasn't any volume difference with the coils tapped on the MM pickup, but series had much more mids, which made it seem louder...just needed to back off the mid pot a bit to make it sound equal - but boy did it sound powerful.

I have two other basses with MM-style pickups, one passive and one active. I have them both wired for series/north/south. But I added one small extra bonus - a .1 mfd cap ala G&L OMG coil tap. I was actually trying wire it up as Series/parallel/coil tap with the cap in it, but made a wiring error and serendipitously wound up with north/south coils instead of parallel...
It's amazing how different the two coils sound just by being positioned 1/2" or so away from each other.
 
Thanks.
The reason I ask is that I have been playing around with tapping coils on MM style pickups for a while, and actually installed switches in my '94 stingray to yield all possibilities - parallel/north coil/south coil/series. There wasn't any volume difference with the coils tapped on the MM pickup, but series had much more mids, which made it seem louder...just needed to back off the mid pot a bit to make it sound equal - but boy did it sound powerful.

I have two other basses with MM-style pickups, one passive and one active. I have them both wired for series/north/south. But I added one small extra bonus - a .1 mfd cap ala G&L OMG coil tap. I was actually trying wire it up as Series/parallel/coil tap with the cap in it, but made a wiring error and serendipitously wound up with north/south coils instead of parallel...
It's amazing how different the two coils sound just by being positioned 1/2" or so away from each other.

Yesterday I rewired to back coil/series/front coil and did [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] (bass->Zoom MS60B (just mild compression)->headset mic input) then used Audacity to take away some noise and compensate for the mid heavy EQ the mobile's mic input produces (intended for making voice clearer). Might not sound too natural but you can definitely distinguish the different timbres for (in order):

1) HB single (back coil -closest to bridge-)
2) HB series
3) HB single (front coil)
4) P only
5) P+HB (back coil, sorta' 70s' J)
6) P+HB (series)
7) P+HB (front coil, a more "macho" J)

The volume difference between sections is real, the compression is minimal and I used a medium touch (not too soft, not too hard). These were all made using the bass as active but with the EQ flat, so any EQ mismatches are real too. The passive sound tends to be just a LITTLE bit darker. I only prefer it for a P only sound, even tho' this is one of the darkest P pickups I've had (also have this cheapo' kit build -and its subsequent mods linked in the description- that's got a WAY brighter P pickup).

On why I lost the parallel setting, well, it sounded thinner and less defined than the back coil soloed. Combined with the P it was a too tamed J sound. OTOH, once I had played enough with the bass I was craving for a more bassy sound out of that humbucker, so went with series (not as bright yet punchy and ballsy -and bright can definitely be brought back with the onboard EQ-). For the cutting sound I'm always after MY thing is 3 and 7 (front coil of humbucker mixed with various levels of P).
 
Last edited:
Anybody knows what's the differences between the Elwoods of Maruszczcyk instruments?

I can only observe the different finished and differnt number of frets it offer. Elwood L offers chambered body as mentioned by Adrian himself during his youtube review. I would like to know whether Elwood X and Absolution also offers chambered finish. I really dig those Elwood finishes.
 
Anybody knows what's the differences between the Elwoods of Maruszczcyk instruments?

I can only observe the different finished and differnt number of frets it offer. Elwood L offers chambered body as mentioned by Adrian himself during his youtube review. I would like to know whether Elwood X and Absolution also offers chambered finish. I really dig those Elwood finishes.
Absolution has the figured maple top and back, pearl neck and body binding, monorail bridge...an Absolutely gorgeous-assed bass!

Since they are all custom made, I'm sure Adrien would be happy to build what you want...

Here is a link that lists all their basses. Click on each Ellwood offering and read about its features...

Invalid Link Removed
 
Last edited:
Absolution has the figured maple top and back, pearl neck and body binding, monorail bridge...an Absolutely gorgeous-assed bass!

Since they are all custom made, I'm sure Adrien would be happy to build what you want...

Here is a link that lists all their basses. Click on each Ellwood offering and read about its features...

Invalid Link Removed

Actually I did visit the link as well as the youtube reviews but it was nt mentioned that elwood X or absolution has chambered body.
 
This Frog is in the classifieds.


IMG_7113.JPG
IMG_7108.JPG
 
Actually I did visit the link as well as the youtube reviews but it was nt mentioned that elwood X or absolution has chambered body.
What I'm saying is that the X and Absolution don't normally get a chambered body....but if you're serious about getting one, run it by Adrien and see if he'd do it. I know the Absolution runs on the heavy side, which is what I prefer...but I can see why someone would want a chambered body, and the Absolution would probably be the best candidate since it already gets a maple top and back regardless. Just have him chamber out the Alder core and slap the maple on top and bottom. Done.

The X on the other hand, does not get chambered...it would need to get some sort of top wood like the Absolution or Euro...but then it would cease being an X....it would be a chambered version of the other two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: addicted
What I'm saying is that the X and Absolution don't normally get a chambered body....but if you're serious about getting one, run it by Adrien and see if he'd do it. I know the Absolution runs on the heavy side, which is what I prefer...but I can see why someone would want a chambered body, and the Absolution would probably be the best candidate since it already gets a maple top and back regardless. Just have him chamber out the Alder core and slap the maple on top and bottom. Done.

The X on the other hand, does not get chambered...it would need to get some sort of top wood like the Absolution or Euro...but then it would cease being an X....it would be a chambered version of the other two.

Thanks. I though the X has that top wood treatment too. I seemingly see a light flame maple pattern on the body. However still, it does not have a binding around the body or fantastic wood top so that would still differentiate it from Absolution or Euro. Anyway, I got a reply on youtube that he can make the X to be chambered as well. He's a very flexible an versatile guy.

Absolution is a beast and X feels vintage to me which is why I lean towards that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eastcoasteddie