vision
It's all about the groove!
- Feb 25, 2005
- 3,988
- 618
- 47
- Disclosures
- Endorsing Artist: MTD Basses, La Bella Strings, and 64 Audio IEMs
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Man, that is a killer bass. Whens the next bass day
I would be interested to hear your comparisons with this and the Roscoe. I know they are two dif. beasts, but I am wondering why you went the MTD route(not that that is a terrible path)
OK, I will try to explain it. From the moment I saw the roscoe, I loved it (buckeye burl on ash body with vera board and bart/bart system) and had to buy it (without playing it). I actually really liked the tone, until I heard a skjold (Vics) and how versatile the sound was. I tried to get a good slap tone out the Roscoe and I could, but not as good as the skjold. So I ended up picking up two skjolds and keeping my roscoe. ( I know this is a MTD thread and I am getting to the point). When I compared the skjolds to the Roscoe I really didn't care for the sound as much, so Vic changed the preamp to the aguilar, which made a big difference (IMO). Really opened up the high end and made the slap tone better. Then I started checking out some MTDs and really dug the tone and versatility (like the skjold, but voiced different).
I thought I would keep a skjold, roscoe and buy a MTD and be happy, but then thought the roscoe might not get played enough to justify so I worked out a trade for a MTD535. It hurt me to do the trade, but the MTD535 really hits the spot.
This is not a burn on roscoes. I actually preferred the feel of the neck, and the look of the top. Although, I now feel the buckeye top was some of the reason I couldn't get the sound I was looking for. I will own another roscoe, but with a harder top, nordstrands DCs and either the audere or aguilar pre.
So BC, a long answer, but the MTD really is versatile. Killer, killer slap tone and great fingerstyle. I really love it. Again, I am not a spalt top lover, but I would have a hard time having one built with the same specs with a different top in case it didn't sound as good as this one. When you and Vic get a chance to play you will know what I mean. Vic and I are planning on going to the St Louis GTG this saturday, you could check it out then.
BIG +1! I was literally thinking the same exact thing based on how well that finish worked for me on another (tho non-MTD) bass I have. It's just enough to give it character and really make the grain pop out, but not enough to mask anything. GREAT idea!!!My vote is for natural!!! If you must have color, maybe an amber burst...
Actually, I'm not convinced this is true based on the Roscoes I've owned and played (both of which had much harder tops on them), but that's another thread.Although, I now feel the buckeye top was some of the reason I couldn't get the sound I was looking for. I will own another roscoe, but with a harder top, nordstrands DCs and either the audere or aguilar pre.
He knows. He's been over to my house several times.So BC, a long answer, but the MTD really is versatile. Killer, killer slap tone and great fingerstyle. I really love it. Again, I am not a spalt top lover, but I would have a hard time having one built with the same specs with a different top in case it didn't sound as good as this one. When you and Vic get a chance to play you will know what I mean.
OK, I will try to explain it. From the moment I saw the roscoe, I loved it (buckeye burl on ash body with vera board and bart/bart system) and had to buy it (without playing it). I actually really liked the tone, until I heard a skjold (Vics) and how versatile the sound was. I tried to get a good slap tone out the Roscoe and I could, but not as good as the skjold. So I ended up picking up two skjolds and keeping my roscoe. ( I know this is a MTD thread and I am getting to the point). When I compared the skjolds to the Roscoe I really didn't care for the sound as much, so Vic changed the preamp to the aguilar, which made a big difference (IMO). Really opened up the high end and made the slap tone better. Then I started checking out some MTDs and really dug the tone and versatility (like the skjold, but voiced different).
I thought I would keep a skjold, roscoe and buy a MTD and be happy, but then thought the roscoe might not get played enough to justify so I worked out a trade for a MTD535. It hurt me to do the trade, but the MTD535 really hits the spot.
This is not a burn on roscoes. I actually preferred the feel of the neck, and the look of the top. Although, I now feel the buckeye top was some of the reason I couldn't get the sound I was looking for. I will own another roscoe, but with a harder top, nordstrands DCs and either the audere or aguilar pre.
So BC, a long answer, but the MTD really is versatile. Killer, killer slap tone and great fingerstyle. I really love it. Again, I am not a spalt top lover, but I would have a hard time having one built with the same specs with a different top in case it didn't sound as good as this one. When you and Vic get a chance to play you will know what I mean. Vic and I are planning on going to the St Louis GTG this saturday, you could check it out then.
Actually, I'm not convinced this is true based on the Roscoes I've owned and played (both of which had much harder tops on them), but that's another thread.
He knows. He's been over to my house several times.![]()
Right. The key is the thickness of the top, and as we know MTD's have a pretty thick top. You make a good point on the Spanish Cedar, but I guess what I'm saying is, without getting too far off-topic, if you go with his standard pickups, there's an inherent character there that's always there regardless of wood combos, and while the two I personally owned were SC with hard tops, I have played Salukis, and even with all those variables, certain things were still very prevalent... even after swapping the preamp.I would think it would have as much to do with the Spanish Cedar. I thought were bad until I played an ash bodied one. I asked Chuck at BassEmporium why this one sounded so much better/different and he pointed out the Ash body, It was then that I realized the half a dozen or so Roscoes I had played in the past had all been Spanish Cedar with a variety of tops.
I generally don't put much stock in tops making a big difference in solid bodies with maybe the exception of Roscoes which have pretty thick tops.
+1I should clarify that I think it was the top and the pickups. I think if I would have dropped in some Nordy DCs with the aguilar I would have achieved the sound I was looking for, but I wanted to be sure. Instead of investing another $350 in the roscoe that I certainly wouldn't have got back out of it I decided to go with the MTD. I like roscoes and will have another one, but it will be more open and clear like my MTD.
Right. The key is the thickness of the top, and as we know MTD's have a pretty thick top. You make a good point on the Spanish Cedar, but I guess what I'm saying is, without getting too far off-topic, if you go with his standard pickups, there's an inherent character there that's always there regardless of wood combos, and while the two I personally owned were SC with hard tops, I have played Salukis, and even with all those variables, certain things were still very prevalent... even after swapping the preamp.
Hi all,
I'm waiting for my new MTD 535-24, and have to choose the color...
That's just impossible to choose...
So I give you a photo of the top. That's a myrtle burl top on ash body. The fingerboard will be hondurian rosewood.
I don't like "cold" colors like blue/green. So the possibilities I see are :
- natural
- dark cherry sunburst (Mike Tobias' favorite)
- tortoise shell sunburst
- maybe dark amber sunburst (very similar as tortoise shell)
- other ? (ice tea, honey...)
Do you think the natural will be good ? Cause the myrtle is yellow-green...
If you've another idea, just say !
The only thing that I'm sure is that this bass'll be beautiful with any color...
Tx a lot.
I'm going to have to say natural. That top has some great figuring that I wouldn't want to obscure with any finish. But if you go the finish route, I'm with Vic and vision and saying light amber, maybe even ice tea.
Hi all,
I'm waiting for my new MTD 535-24, and have to choose the color...
That's just impossible to choose...
So I give you a photo of the top. That's a myrtle burl top on ash body. The fingerboard will be hondurian rosewood.
I don't like "cold" colors like blue/green. So the possibilities I see are :
- natural
- dark cherry sunburst (Mike Tobias' favorite)
- tortoise shell sunburst
- maybe dark amber sunburst (very similar as tortoise shell)
- other ? (ice tea, honey...)
Do you think the natural will be good ? Cause the myrtle is yellow-green...
If you've another idea, just say !
The only thing that I'm sure is that this bass'll be beautiful with any color...
Tx a lot.
I love his bursts as well, but the dark cherry burst (which is what I have on my latest MTD purchase), while beautiful, is so dark that I think a lot of the grain's beauty is subdued except in very bright light. I think the top being discussed here would do well with a lighter colored burst, or not even really a burst at all, but maybe an overall "dusting" of amber stain for the sole purpose of bringing the figuring out. IMHO of course.I'm partial to the Dark Cherry Burst. That's what I have on my bass so I guess that makes me a bit biased. But Mike's bursts are killer. You really can't go wrong with any color choice....
+1!just finished checking out the seminar...how cool is that? i enjoyed watching it
just finished checking out the seminar...how cool is that? i enjoyed watching it
Great videos!