$380
it's honestly not that bad.. i just have to find something small enough to file the b and e string slots.
Now..also add in ALL the things (stings, files, etc) you had to buy plus your time doing all of this. And the cost is....????
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
$380
it's honestly not that bad.. i just have to find something small enough to file the b and e string slots.
Now..also add in ALL the things (stings, files, etc) you had to buy plus your time doing all of this. And the cost is....????
All true. Still...looks like the Rondo has a multitude of "hidden" costs. The cost differential between a Rondo and one of the competitors (Hellcat VI, etc.) isn't as much as meets the eye if you just look solely at the list price of the Rondo. From all the posts I have read here it seems that one common theme is that a "stock" Rondo really needs more than the usual array of "extras" to get it ready for prime-time. IMHO, that needs to be added in to the cost (in your head) if someone is thinking of getting one.
If I had to pick only one though, I think my Argus plays better than my Hellcat, not to mention sounds better for what I do (Hellcat more BASS guitar, Argus more bass GUITAR)...and I think it looks better. I am not nearly as wowed as to what comes out of the Schecter...sure I could upgrade the pickups but that adds to the COST of the thing... The pickups on the Argus are no doubt cheap but sound much better than the "Duncan Designed" garbage.
Competition/choice is good, IMHO.
I'll tell you what we'll see...
![]()
![]()
Yeah, that's right. The nut on my Argus just cracked off under the low E! What the crap?! The E wasn't even up to tension! It just snapped off!
I purchased the bass on the 18'th of last month and received it on either the 22nd or 23rd. It's now 30 days from the initial purchase and this happens.
You always do a nice job of defending Rondo! If someone likes cheap and doesn't mind fragile instruments that apparently fall apart as well as require work, time and additional money to make them playable I guess that's a good choice.![]()
If you don't like Agile then don't buy one
Now..also add in ALL the things (stings, files, etc) you had to buy plus your time doing all of this. And the cost is....????

Boy, is that ever the truth! Buyer beware it is.........
Nah. Just a personal gripe against people who come on here (not you) and slam some equipment as "garbage" while ignoring the shortcomings of their own stuff. Best just to live and let live, wouldn't you agree?
And, I love cheap! Especially good bargains! I'm a regular poster on "Hot Deals."
I still haven't seen, outside of 2 mentions, anything about that piece of Burmese driftwood called the "dead on 67" danelectro Bass VI baritone whatever. Having obtained one for the current cost of an original thumbscrew from a "vintage" 70's fender product, hawked by two dubious fellas named Frog and Snake, on ebay ($225), I thought I'd throw in a word or two for all of you who have decided to buy from ummm err...elsewhere.
As was almost definitively decided here about 5980 posts ago, the thing is a 30" scale. Body is made out of basswood, more probably some Mystery Wood pool of glue and left over take out cartons. Mine is finished in a soothing yet oddly disturbing "colbalt blue" which actually contains two toxic grams of colbalt..it reminds me of an Earle Schiebb paint job my dad had on a 1963 Rambler product he owned. the "retro swirl" pickguard..is..
It came from the "factory" strung with JA know what strings, but obviously it was to be used as a baritone, so I immediately supplied some used strings from my stash of short scale Daddario flats that I use on my real instrument, a Rick Turner 30" scale tenor bass. I "set it up" as well as inhumanly possible, and lo and beholt, the damn thing sounded pretty ok...I "plugged it up" (chicago blues speak for plugged it in) to a Silvertone twin 12, turned the awful verb up, flipped on my Seymour Shapeshifter trem.and ...not all that different from my first dano long horn six, a real one from Nate in Neptune NJ..hint for yews all: Compressors are a bass VI's best buddy. And if you like the sound of single coils (I know you do!) and use one to actually play BASS as opposed to whatever that kid in the Cure does he said hiding behind my dead on 67, then.. then plug it up into a Roland Oc-3 the one with a cutoff for the octaver frequency..I have startled many a bluesboy at a fairly big name Chicago fancy pants blues club where I toiled in the house band by whipping that sucker on in the middle of what they thought was their big moment...HA! needless to say, I no longer toil there.
Over the last 40 years, I have always owned and played a VI, alongside my usual P 4 bangers..RT built me a combo of a VI (in this case a V, but why confuse you anymore?) and a "conventional" bass, but that's another thread.. I've had 3 pre CBS Fender's, a few dano's both from NJ and not, and several JJ bari's and VI's as well (which are still my fav's for that single coil/with a pick thing) If you like the real O Skool tone of a wooden slab bridge, kinda bad single coil pickups, a sorta trem bar that works sort of, etc...it's really a good little noisemaker. I had to drill the two tuning pegs out to get a flatwound 100 and 80 in there, and I am waiting to see if those LaBella HC flats will fit, but really..these things cannot be any worse than the rondo VI's and maybe for some things, like Maxwell Street Blues, noise rawk, banging a trance line on a 12/8 West African poly riddim, doing a bubble up line on old school reggae, or surf's up, they might be better..and they are ridiculously inexpensive, just like Nate's originals. take that $200 you'll save from consuming an Agile product,, invest it in some credit swap derivatives, and who knows, maybe someday you will be the lucky one to be able to buy a genuine 1976 fender nickel screw for $42,300 on "the 'bay".
I really like my Schecter Hellcat VI - it's very comfortable to play, the workmanship is flawless, it has a TonePros locking bridge and graphite nut, and (while the Teisco Del Ray headstock could be better) I think it looks pretty damn cool, with kind of a sharper, more aggressive take on the Jaguar body. However, I was never happy with the pickups: personally I find the Duncan Designed mini-humbuckers are muddy and dull, and if you split them they sound better (brighter, twangier), but they're also thin and underpowered, and in either setting they have a bit of a harsh edge to them. I'm not sure why Schecter decided to use minihums on a bass VI instrument, unless it was simply because they'd already been using them on the standard scale Hellcat, but they don't work well in the bass range, in my opinion, and there's a good reason why most people don't bother to split minis.
So after thinking about it for years I finally went for it and changed out the pickups. I got the guitar back from the shop on Thursday and here's what it looks like:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The neck and middle pickups are Curtis Novak Bass VI repros (you can see the shop got the teeth backwards, but I don't know that it makes much difference). They're in the same positions as the pickups on a Bass VI and are RWRP with each other.
The bridge pickup is a Novak custom wound based on his Electric XII reconstruction pickup. I wanted a noisefree single-pickup option that didn't sound like a dual-coil humbucker (see my comments above regarding dullness) and always liked the way a Precision bass sounded, so I thought the split-pickup approach might work. I reversed it to tighten the bass and sweeten the top end (my Yamaha BB1200S does the same thing). Curtis wound it to match the other two pickups and really outdid himself - all three sound beautiful, but the bridge pickup is just gorgeous.
The five-way switch gives the normal Strat pickup combos in "normal" mode; the mini-toggle flips it into an alternate mode (like a shift button) to give me the other two combinations from the Bass VI (neck+bridge in parallel, or all three in parallel), plus each of the series pairings. I should have been more explicit about the locations of the knobs and switches, because the layout ended up a little cramped, but using these small knobs actually works fine.
In addition to the volume and tone controls there's a bass cut knob (very handy for thinning out the sound, especially on the series settings), which works pretty well but will probably need some further tweaking to dial it in just right. It's basically just a variable strangle switch.
How does it sound? I'll try to post some clips soon, but I'm going to have to tear myself away from playing it, because I love how it sounds. The Novaks are much clearer, more detailed, and more dynamic than the stock pickups. The neck pickup has the classic Bass VI hollow twang, the middle pickup is nice and woody, and the bridge pickup actually does a very good imitation of a Shergold six-string bass. The pickups are all really well matched, so flipping between them feels like I'm just shifting the distribution of the harmonics. The ten different pickup combinations might be a bit of overkill, but all of the positions suggest different uses (the series options are bit nasal but ensure that I have plenty of low end grunt on tap), so I'm going to enjoy exploring them for some time.
Verdict: big, big improvement that makes this already very playable guitar sound like a million bucks.
Ha that was a great review!! I tried out the Dead On 67 guitar at GC and didn't like it at all. They didn't have any baritones or bass VI's but I presume I wouldn't like them either. But I've tried other Danelectro stuff in the past that I did like very much. It just seems that this particular model may not be my cup of tea.