TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The set up that I went with sounds fuller and deeper than the combo. Slight difference, but I could hear it side by side. The combo sounded like it didn't have as much low end and was a weaker tone (not volume wise).
I actually found the exact opposite to be true when I was testing. I thought the combo was much fuller. I ended up just buying the head though and pairing it with my existing cab.
Oh, and I didn't pay my MarkBass stack that I just got. That's a rare piece of equipment my parents paid for. It was a gift for a few occasions put together plus for college (I'm not taking my big 4x10 stack).
What is GC charging for the F1?I ordered the F1 from GC today It seems they are showing up in the system I should hear in a few days the status on ETA
I ordered the F1 from GC today It seems they are showing up in the system I should hear in a few days the status on ETA
Cool! What did you not like in the 104HR? Moreso what do you prefer with the 104HF?
Got a pic of this mighty rig?
I love my LMII no complaints there
Weight is always an issue for me with gear The lighter I can travel w/o sacrificing quality the better for me
It`s just that I don`t like the way the lower notes comes out of a rear-ported cab in general. It`s like a surround-thing IMO, and most so if you place it near to the wall or a corner. But all of this IMO, there are plenty of cabs that are made this way, like early SWR, Eden ++.
To me the HF sounds a little bit fuller, and the HR a little bit more mid-oriented. But the HR are far more portable, and no bad cab at all. Try them both if you can.
Here`s the only pick I got, sadly it also includes me..
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=57423&d=1178029879