I think Wiki has some pretty good links which explains the most commonly understood way the terms are used. Steve's definition is a pretty spot on summary.I dunno, I think they're reversed here...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think Wiki has some pretty good links which explains the most commonly understood way the terms are used. Steve's definition is a pretty spot on summary.I dunno, I think they're reversed here...
I think Wiki has some pretty good links which explains the most commonly understood way the terms are used. Steve's definition is a pretty spot on summary.
I dunno, I think they're reversed here...
Your argument lacks logic. Its completely possible that the way you were using the words differed from the way the majority were using the words. Whether or not wikipedia existed at the time is irrelevant. In any event, language evolves so even if the way you used the terms was correct at the time, it may not be now.Wikipedia wasn't really up and going so much when I started high school. However, the terms nerd and geek were in common use. And there was very much a difference, being that nerds hung out in groups and had friends. Geeks were loners, usually into computer stuff.
I don't really care if that disagrees with the wikipedia definitions, as we were using the words when wiki had barely gotten started.
Your argument lacks logic. Its completely possible that the way you were using the words differed from the way the majority were using the words. Whether or not wikipedia existed at the time is irrelevant. In any event, language evolves so even if the way you used the terms was correct at the time, it may not be now.
agreed. I always thought of the "nerds" as the intelligent but slightly, eh, misdirected [as ordained by an arbitrary society] individual that finds excitement and interest in things like education [math, science, whatever], and meybe have strange tastes and preferences. I consider myself a nerd.
Geeks: they're a whole different story. Whether they're smart or not is irrelevant, they're the type of people who play WoW for hours straight, speak klingon, dress up as cartoon characters, and are fundamentally socially ********. Think of this guy:
![]()
This is an internet forum. You expect logic?
I don't care about the wiki definitions of the words because they were quite well in use for years before wiki where I grew up. Slang by its very nature differs from region to region.
Good. You've got to realize that the internet is a terrible place.Having had this conversation, i've now adjusted my expectations.
Wouldn't it be great if one day, was a way that academics could somehow come up with some kind of reference tool to caputre the commonly understood meanings of words. I bet whoever invented that would make millions.
Good. You've got to realize that the internet is a terrible place.
It would never work. Just look at all the arguing that goes on at Urbandictionary. The same words often mean different things just on the other side of town.
The thing about slang is that it's always changing and it's unstandardized. As soon as one could somehow codify slang and catalog all of it, the reference would be outdated, as it would have evolved.
And you'd still have the problem of the same slang terms meaning different things in different areas. Just take the word "fag" for instance. In some places, it means cigarette. In other places, it's a crude word used to denigrate people. That's the thing about slang, it's often so very localized. It's not the same as proper English that can simply be looked up in a dictionary (not that dictionaries even agree, depending on what country you happen to be in).
I long ago calibrated my "faith in humanity meter" to work with negative numbers due to the internet.I prefer not to judge the internet as a whole. I take it person by person.![]()
I know that, but it doesn't really apply here. Oxford, Cambridge and Merriam Webster have little bearing on the realm of slang speech. It would be ridiculous for them to attempt to catalog it, as the dictionary is generally a tool for proper language and writing, which slang is not. The former is much for stable and standardized across large groups of people, the latter is not. It should be noted, however, that not even "proper" English, as defined in dictionaries, is truly standardized, as it differs (albeit on much more minor points than slang does) between a couple countries. Slang differs just between two cities in the same US state.I was being faceatious. I believe such a thing already exists and is commonly believed to have been first published in English by Samuel Johnson.
OK ...
NERD; completely obsessed with/self-appointed authority on XXXXX.
GEEK; same as above, with the added ability to actually function at XXXXX.
My favorite metalhead quote:
"King Diamond is a trained opera singer, doood"
I'm not sure why that matters. It doesn't make him any less ridiculous.
The metalheads I know always seem in awe of quotes in Latin, as if it were a much more significant language than others. There's a linguistics forum I'm on where the Latin thread is 90% requests for translations of "cool" phrases - intended for tattoos, of course. Maybe that's one thing that makes them nerdy in current parlance.
The metalheads I know always seem in awe of quotes in Latin, as if it were a much more significant language than others. There's a linguistics forum I'm on where the Latin thread is 90% requests for translations of "cool" phrases - intended for tattoos, of course. Maybe that's one thing that makes them nerdy in current parlance.

The metal heads of today are kings of the sub-genre. I quit metal when the cookie monster vocal, mid-scooping, and tuning to teh low C became mandatory.
My brother is a metal head and you wouldn't believe how awesome he thinks he is. It's kinda sad.