• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Last night kicking out the jams. I'm kind of disappointed in these Thunderbuckers (real ones from the Ranch) - they sound right, but seem kind of soft on the output, and they're raised pretty close to the strings as it is. I have a single 'bucker in a Dunable Thunderclapper that's pretty hairy. What gives? I am suspecting the weak stock wiring/pots/etc.(?) which I kept in this bass.

An 'S' is hotter than a 66B (bridge) pup so in the neck position it's a lot hotter than a 66N (neck). They're Alnico magnet pickups. They need to be much closer to the strings than any post '69 USA Thunderbird pickup, especially ceramic magnet post '79 pickups.

Basically set ThunderBuckers so that when you fret the highest note you normally play they just miss touching the string. Then lower as necessary to balance the neck and bridge.

500k Volume Pots, 250k w/.047 cap Tone Pot. Back off one of the two volume pots slightly for hottest signal.
 
I went down the repairs rathole with my old van. It was a 1973 Chevy that should have been scrapped before I got it, but I kept it running, at great cost, for about six years. I really liked it, partly because it was so uncouth looking. It was loud, slow, thirsty, and had bad brakes, and it could haul anything. The body shape and cargo space was better than the 2002 I have now, but it wasn't worth the agony and expense. I could have bought two more 2002 vans like the one I have now for what I dumped into that junker to keep it going. The $300 purchase price should have been a dead giveaway, but I can be kinda dumb at times.

And after you’ve dropped the money into the bomb, you sorta want x more life to justify the spend in your mind. Which never seems to eventuate.

Or is that just me ?
 
And after you’ve dropped the money into the bomb, you sorta want x more life to justify the spend in your mind. Which never seems to eventuate.

Or is that just me ?

Cars (like many other things) have an ongoing cost of ownership. Buying a new car, all the parts are new and very little maintenance beyond routine oil changes etc. are required. But, as a car ages, parts wear and need repair/replacement. If you care to do the math, cars have an operating cost (beyond consumable gasoline etc) that is a function of distance and time. In a new car this takes the form of loan payments (for those that finance or a lump sum to those that don't), in an older car it takes the form of periodic repairs. The cost of repairs is not the price of continuing to drive, it is the price of the driving you have already done.

When driving, I often think about the consumption of tires, brakes, filters etc. that is happening as I am on my way.
 
Cars (like many other things) have an ongoing cost of ownership. Buying a new car, all the parts are new and very little maintenance beyond routine oil changes etc. are required. But, as a car ages, parts wear and need repair/replacement. If you care to do the math, cars have an operating cost (beyond consumable gasoline etc) that is a function of distance and time. In a new car this takes the form of loan payments (for those that finance or a lump sum to those that don't), in an older car it takes the form of periodic repairs. The cost of repairs is not the price of continuing to drive, it is the price of the driving you have already done.

When driving, I often think about the consumption of tires, brakes, filters etc. that is happening as I am on my way.
Don't forget the price of NOT driving an older car...
 
Don't forget the price of NOT driving an older car...

Yep - machines need to run periodically to keep fluids in all the places they need to be and keep things from precipitating out... Note that I said that the operating costs ere a function of distance and time.

Entropy is patient and always wins over time.
 
Yep - machines need to run periodically to keep fluids in all the places they need to be and keep things from precipitating out... Note that I said that the operating costs ere a function of distance and time.

Entropy is patient and always wins over time.
Thermodynamics.....did a paper in school to analyze entropy in NYC's garbage disposal challenges....
never lies..
 
It was such a lovely October day here in Seattle too, unfortunately, I choose to have a root canal done today, so I've dozed a good portion of it off in a Valium haze. :woot:
Well, that isn't the ideal passtime. It's gloomy this morning, but at least I can see West Seattle out of the office window.
 
And after you’ve dropped the money into the bomb, you sorta want x more life to justify the spend in your mind. Which never seems to eventuate.

Or is that just me ?
Yes. Eventually a sunk cost is just a sunk cost. When the dashboard wiring failed, I figured it was a sign from Cthulu that it was time for the bomb to detonate somewhere else. I took the manifold and carb off of it, because those were actually reasonably functional. The rest got turned into rebar or wind up toys or something. I hope.

I buy used vehicles because the original owner takes the biggest hit. After about 10 years, a modern vehicle is still just fine for a long time, but far cheaper. It won't get a whole lot cheaper after that, unless there's something really wrong. There might be a few repairs, but nothing like what a car payment and depreciation cost.

A friend has a 10 year old Nissan of some kind that she bought used. She currently owes money on it, more than it's worth. She doesn't do numbers. Oh, well.
 
Well, that isn't the ideal passtime. It's gloomy this morning, but at least I can see West Seattle out of the office window.

It'll be raining soon, days like this are made for model trains...………………….

Here's the one I was scratch building, all finished up.
uY26ETS.jpg
 

Latest posts