• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

This ^ reply has made me realize something I'd never thought of before. I spend very little time above 7th or 8th fret on any string so intonating exactly isn't that much of a priority. I get it pretty close by tuning to the 4th(i.e. C on the G string, etc.). I don't use open strings very much, so tuning to the open is sorta useless-to me. I'm not a 'soloist' and don't do chords so this "method" works well for me. I also tend to stay outta our guitarist's range since my 'job' is to be the base of our music. YMMV.
My VP is currently tuned DGCF and one song this morning needed* notes from that low D to E two octaves up (11th fret).

*wanted, needed, whatever
 
Saw this on the FB Thunderbird page. I toyed with the idea for the Explorer I had, but sold the bass before doing it.
I like it for a solid-colored Bird and I'm thinking at least one other member *coughcough* @KaraQ *coughcough* might be intriged by this look. I did mention our club to the owner, but he might not have seen my post yet.




View attachment 4370893

View attachment 4370899
A number of people were telling him not to, but I love it.
 
If we're sharing pics of our rides, here's my bucketView attachment 4371178 View attachment 4371180
Ok, now you’ve peaked my interest. I see a larger than stock tail pipe and a hood scoop and hood pins on that Pinto Wagon. Is there something special under the hood?
I’ve heard of people dropping 302 V8 engines in them, I’d bet that makes for a wild ride.
 
Today’s sound guy (a bass player pro audio dude) was in love with my tone today. “What was different? It’s the best I’ve heard from you!”
He’s mainly used to the CP but this was my second time recently playing the VP. It finally dawned on me; right after the last time I used it at church, I gave up on the Rotos (not enough low end) and put the EBCFs back on. As we discussed it, he jumped on a word I used- “balanced”.
“That’s it, balance across the spectrum, lows to highs. It gets through the mix but still holds the bottom down.” (Ahem?)
And that’s with just the neck pickup and EQing out some top end!
 
Last edited:
Today’s sound guy (a bass player pro audio dude) was in love with my tone today. “What was different? It’s the best I’ve heard from you!”
He’s mainly used to the CP but this was my second time recently playing the VP. It finally dawned on me; right after the last time I used it at church, I gave up on the Rotos (not enough low end) and put the EBCFs back on. As we discussed it, he jumped on a word I used- “balanced”.
“That’s it, balance across the spectrum, lows to highs. It gets through the mix but still holds the bottom down.” (Ahem?)
And that’s with just the neck pickup and EQing out some top end!
Interestingly enough, every Tbird I’ve put Cobalt Flats on has sounded fantastic. And as you noted it’s mostly with the neck pup soloed and the tone knob at about 5 or less. Both the Goth (which has dark and over wound pups) and the VP which has brighter gritty pups work superb with the Cobalts. I think I even tried them on my 2015 and liked them. Possibly the perfect flat for Thunderbirds.
 
...
I’ve heard of people dropping 302 V8 engines in them, I’d bet that makes for a wild ride.

When I was in high school, my uncle (dad's youngest brother) had a '73 Pinto that was...not stock.
351 Cleveland w/ dual Holleys on a tunnel ram through the hood, C6, narrowed 9" rear, custom all-aluminum engine bay, stripped interior, fuel cell, plus some other stuff I'm not remembering.

It should have been a drag car. That's what it was originally meant to be. He had street tires on it, and drove it to work - when he didn't have it torn apart, "upgrading" something :rollno:
 
When I was in high school, my uncle (dad's youngest brother) had a '73 Pinto that was...not stock.
351 Cleveland w/ dual Holleys on a tunnel ram through the hood, C6, narrowed 9" rear, custom all-aluminum engine bay, stripped interior, fuel cell, plus some other stuff I'm not remembering.

It should have been a drag car. That's what it was originally meant to be. He had street tires on it, and drove it to work - when he didn't have it torn apart, "upgrading" something :rollno:
Yikes! He was probably well over 400hp with that setup. On a car as light as a pinto that originally had less than 100hp that increase in power would be a real handful.:woot: A wild ride to say the least. :thumbsup:

BTW - just for kicks, I read your post to my wife (she’s every bit the gear head I am) and her first response was “good move on the Cleveland, those upgrades would have been wasted on a Windsor”. Yep, I married the right gal.:smug:
 
Yikes! He was probably well over 400hp with that setup. On a car as light as a pinto that originally had less than 100hp that increase in power would be a real handful.:woot: A wild ride to say the least. :thumbsup:

BTW - just for kicks, I read your post to my wife (she’s every bit the gear head I am) and her first response was “good move on the Cleveland, those upgrades would have been wasted on a Windsor”. Yep, I married the right gal.:smug:

Yep! :thumbsup:

Back then (80s :unsure: ) the Windsor was considered to be more suitable as a boat anchor than and automobile engine. I presume it's still the same?

On a semi-related note, I found out a couple of weeks ago, my dad bought a new challenger a couple of years ago :meh:
After all his bit.....belly-aching about my Mopar products in the 80s & 90s, now he goes & buys one.
I told him next will probably be a Harley (which he also hates), since previously he bought a diesel truck (now a second one :facepalm: ), something he said he'd never get :laugh:
He was going on about how he was/has been tinkering on it, because stock is just a good place to start :smug:
 
The Phase 95 would give you both the Phase 45 and 90, and both script and block versions of each, in a tiny pedal format. What annoyed me about it is that its lights never turn off if it's plugged in. For a gigging board, who cares. But for also using at home, it was too annoying.

Black fingernail polish... who needs annoying little lights anyway?
 
This ^ reply has made me realize something I'd never thought of before. I spend very little time above 7th or 8th fret on any string so intonating exactly isn't that much of a priority. I get it pretty close by tuning to the 4th(i.e. C on the G string, etc.). I don't use open strings very much, so tuning to the open is sorta useless-to me. I'm not a 'soloist' and don't do chords so this "method" works well for me. I also tend to stay outta our guitarist's range since my 'job' is to be the base of our music. YMMV.

I'm right there with you, Mike. Intonating the full neck seems so unnecessary. I intonate open to 12th and call it good.
 
………
The question is for those lucky folks with a new NR Bird. I am still strongly considering just pulling the trigger and ordering one in Pelham blue. How are the necks? Any idea how it would compare to the neck on my 2014 Gibson? Fatter? Thicker? Thinner? Any observations would be most appreciated.
Have a great evening everyone, and a good week as well.

I have a 2018 Gibson, and don’t know how that compares to the 2014, but here’s my data points:

2018
Nut 39mm
12th fret 53.25mm
Headstock 16mm (thickest part)

2021 NR
Nut 42mm
12th fret 56mm
Headstock 16.5 mm

Overall the NR feels fuller in my hand, but still a comfy profile. To a FSO fan, I’d simply say the difference is akin to. P vs J bass, but that’s a simplification, given all the variation.

For the new NR, I had to add a strap button at the neck heel to make it balance where I’m comfortable. After two gigs this weekend, I can honestly say, this has potential become my new number one.