• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Time for our annual RRHOF Bashing

Its pretty sad especially when you consider who was left out of last years class compared to this year. Def Leppard and not Judas Priest? Joke. Janet Jackson and not The Eurythmics? Pathetic. I think Bruce Dickenson said he'd decline if Maiden were inducted, and good for him. It wont ever happen, of course, because they're actually a great band and that matters little in these sort of things.
That said, the Cure is one of my all time favorite bands. I don't know if they give a rats ass about the HOF, but it certainly doesn't make me like them more or less.
 
Many of my favorites are not in the RRHOF, but it doesn't bother me as much as Rolling Stone rating the "greatest guitar players". I heard an interview with Derek Trucks who said he felt a lot of pride when he heard he made the list, only to realize when he saw the list that it was BS. It helps to have that attitude about these things I guess.
 
I have to keep reminding myself, the RRHOF is a museum and a business that needs to keep marketing itself and paying the bills and salaries. That's it. So many nominees that I think really belong there don't get in, and I always scratch my head over many of the inductees. But that's not really the point of the RRHOF, it's merely a sideshow, a walking billboard to keep drawing attention to itself. It's a business model.

Setting up these false equivalencies and pecking orders is just more injustice in the music industry to entertainers and their fans, more smoke and mirrors.
 
Last edited:
that list is brutal for my tastes. The Zombies are definitely the best of the bunch but if that band was an NFL running back would they make it into the Hall of Fame? I think not. I've never liked how the RRHOF's primary criteria for induction seems to be just having done something at least 25 years ago.

They wouldn't make the hall of fame, but they have a few really awesome super bowl plays that everyone remembers with "She's Not There", "Time of the Season" etc.

I'm glad to see the Cure in there. They were enormously influential and they have the large fan base/body of work that usually justifies HOF.

Devo was robbed, though!
 
There are many bands or singers mentioned that might sell a out stadium in New York, or Chicago, but in Texas or some other places could not fill a tiny club. The perception of what is influential in one area, is just that, a personal perception, and may not warrant even 1 listen in another market.
Just because you were influenced by ..so and so... does not mean anyone else even knows what they played.
 
Todd Rundgren was finally nominated this year but not inducted.

What I don't get is that many acts that started in the 1980s and 1990s are already inducted and numerous, well deserving acts from the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s have never even been nominated.

You mean like The Guess Who? How many hits did they have between 1968 and 1973? Lets count: Shakin' All Over, American Woman, No Time, She's Come Undone, Bus Rider, Laughing, Albert Flasher, Clap for the Wolfman, Runnin' Back to Saskatoon.....the Beastie Boys are in, but not the Guess Who? Who's in charge at the RRHOF?

(end of rant)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richland123
2019 inductees just announced:
Radiohead
Janet Jackson
Def Leppard
The Cure
Roxie Music
The Zombies
Stevie Nicks

Personally happy to see The Zombies recognized. Don't understand the Janet Jackson decision. Never a huge Radiohead, Cure, or Roxie Music fan, but OK. Could go either way on Nicks.

Discuss.

I like all of these bands/artists, especially The Cure and Roxie Music and Stevie Nicks, but the idea of the Rock'n'Roll Hall of Fame is antithetical to the IDEA of rock'n'roll in the first place, so screw that place. Happy for the inductees, though.