Was there any good punk rock?

The whole point was to be terrible and horrible…. If you don’t get it then like whatever.

The whole point was to be terrible and horrible…. If you don’t get it then like whatever.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

You really fall for that cliche of ‘punk rock’ ineptness, don’t you? Punk/New Wave/whatever else saved rock from the mediocrity that was going on at the time, at least for some of us. The labels actually ignored it for the most part, because the people running them had too much money tied up in bombastic arena rockers, and didn’t understand the new culture anyway, and were afraid of losing control. It was a grassroots movement, with roots in music dating back to the 60’s, even the 50’s, where the people involved took control themselves, finding the clubs, putting out their own records, setting up their own tours, publishing their own fanzines, and not waiting for corporate tastemakers to tell them what to listen to. That negative criteria you mentioned? That could be used to describe plenty of one hit wonder garage bands of the mid-60’s, or maybe even The Stones. If ‘rock’ has died, it’s from old age. MTV itself killed music in the grand scheme of things.
It’s not an argument, it’s a simple statement of truth.
Why don’t you watch “We Jam Econo” and then get back to us on this?
Oh shag off.I've watched it, years ago. I said I don't recall, not that they hadn't; two different things.
As for argument, see where I prefaced by saying "broadly", understand?
Boring.
I think you have strong opinions about the music you like or dislike and you really, really want to make others "see that you are right".I admit that I used to love the Ramones when I was a kid, but I don't really get most of it beyond that.
Just because something caused a big sensation doesn't mean that it had value. And it seems like the people who went to the concerts were always trying to find some new experience to make them happy. And it never really happened if they still talk about the past.
What do you think.
Your mom?If something that supposedly has so much value, can actually hurt the person who loves it if they hear a differing opinion, doesn't make a lot of sense.
Does Mr. Coleman concur?
This gets said, but you have to ask yourself how true it actually is.
Personally I believe punk killed rock music.
I don't mean in some abstract way either, I mean it quite directly told the labels, you could promote people who couldn't sing in key, play on time, or be all that much more original than 1 6 4 5.
If rock made it to the MTV era without punk, I think rock music today would still be alive.
That's not something I'm concerned about.
I liked early Gang Of Four. Primitive and powerful.
Their SNL appearance is nothing short of chaotic zen. That was the "punkist" thing I've ever seen.The first Fear album has comic value and some good songs. That’s really the only punk I ever got in to.