The concept of punk rock as being a fad is a laughable one, honestly. This is as absurd as considering jazz or classical music to be fads, IMHO.
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's not about being technically proficient.
You don't need to be a ferrari driver to love cars.
But when a manufacturer creates a product line with no quality controls, don't be shocked people lose interest in driving.
Punk rock was the equivalent of flooding the used car markets with lemons.
It has nothing to do with the need to support prog. It's the absurdity of allowing the industry to degrade to people who literally couldn't play their instruments.
Not being a super car, doesn't mean you need to be a suicide wagon.
I was into punk as a kid, it's not a shock why it became so popular, it has a low cost of entry. Literally anyone can be a punk rock musician in 6 weeks.
It's not a question why a 15 year would want to drive a sucide wagon with no muffler.
The question is why on earth would someone be driving a suicide wagon at 35.
Punk because a genre that more or less poisoned people on music.
Punk was hostile to the idea music could be any kind of a meritocracy, instead it became about fashion/anti merit.
This thread reminds me of this video.
While I never really liked punk music, I was a big metalhead and arguably metal derived from punk which derived from rock so I got respect. I like the attitude and some things they say.
I'd argue metal started before punk with bands like Black Sabbath, but there's been lots of interplay from the 1980s onwards.
While I never really liked punk music, I was a big metalhead and arguably metal derived from punk which derived from rock so I got respect. I like the attitude and some things they say.
I'd argue metal started before punk with bands like Black Sabbath, but there's been lots of interplay from the 1980s onwards.
Agreed.
Here's why some people think punk was just a passing fad: By the time punk started to get noticed by the mainstream media, it was already on it's way out. It had actually been around for a decade or more. (Stooges, New York Dolls, Patti Smith). What most people think of as punk was really the post-punk era. This is the period where the threads of punk was still prevalent but the music got a little more sophisticated. That includes bands like the Clash, Joy Division, and Siouxsie and the Banshees.
How do you account for Californian punk's mainstream popularity in the 90s and 00s then?
Punk's not dead. This thread is testament enough.
Changing the face of Rock & Roll & pioneering an entire new sub-genre had loads of value.Just because something caused a big sensation doesn't mean that it had value.
I think it's really weird to start a thread bashing an entire style of Rock & Roll that many of us adore.What do you think.
Right. I feel sorry for them, but I'm not saying they are bad people.
Here's why some people think punk was just a passing fad: By the time punk started to get noticed by the mainstream media, it was already on it's way out. It had actually been around for a decade or more. (Stooges, New York Dolls, Patti Smith). What most people think of as punk was really the post-punk era. This is the period where the threads of punk was still prevalent but the music got a little more sophisticated. That includes bands like the Clash, Joy Division, and Siouxsie and the Banshees.