Originally posted by Brad Johnson
It's still a judgement![]()
I can judge that you have hair (or not, i don't know
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Originally posted by Brad Johnson
It's still a judgement![]()
This is exactly what I figured would happen. I speak up in this thread and express how I feel about it, and everyone jumps on the PC bandwagon and tries to beat me down for being a bigot. I am not allowed to disagree, that makes me judgemental. I am a bigot for ASSUMING a straight guy would share more in common with me than a gay guy. My opinions are now BS. -Mike
It's amazing how unpopular open minds seem to be getting these days It's damn near robotic sometimes...
See person
Assume their qualities
Shun or engage based on assumption of qualities vs. own values
Miss out on 90% of the really cool people out there because of the stereotypes in your program.
The sad thing is that very few people are forced to act this way... it's learned and/or voluntary.
Originally posted by Skorzen
You see as someone posted earlier in this thread, you can't tolerate intolerence. Would someone care to define tolerence? that statement seems rather hypicritical. here in lies the lie of tolerence. Tolerence really means agree with us, or you are going to be persecuted as intolerent because we can not tolerate any free thinking people.
Sorry, but I am not really seeing much open mindedness here. I see people expressing their views, and either being affirmed or torn down(or both) by others with their preconcieved opinions. How many of you who are railling about the discrimination have actually given serious thought to the opinions expressed by those who have expressed that they dissagree with the homosexual lifestyle. And the same for those who dissagree with the lifestyle, Have you actually listened to the arguments made by the other view? I see open mindedness as being willing to LISTEN to other people's views, and then make a judgement on whether you agree with them.
not all views are right, or even right for that person as we are being told constantly. it was right for Osama Bin Ladin(his personal belief) to attack the united states and kill thousands of people? Or is holding to the moral idea that there is value to human life too confining? Congress saw it was right for the united states to go into a conflict with Iraq, does that mean it was right?
This whole thread seems very robotic on both sides. We get a few dissenting opinions, and then the vast army of the PC enlightened elite, who must share this enlightenment with others. With no tolerence to peoples culture history or customs. The enlightenment must continue not matter what the cost.
Originally posted by DeepDeath
I never said I was tolerant, I don't "tolerate" people different from myself such as homosexuals, females, elders, and people of different ethnicities. Because in reality they are not different from me, there are persons and that is it. I am intolerant of bigotism to a metaphor of as much as Hitler was intolerant to the Jew's. Frankly because bigotism is ignorant, inhumane and JUST PLAIN WRONG. Don't try to defend your case by using some quasi-"american" "I HAVE THE FREEDOM TO THINK WHATEVER I WANT" crap. You have the "right" to do so, but don't think other's are not going to use there rights without ignorance agaisn't yours.
Frankly because bigotism is ignorant, inhumane and JUST PLAIN WRONG.
Originally posted by Mr.QuakQuak
I can sum it all up in one word. Ignorance
Originally posted by clef360
No, the cop isn't implying anything about the morality of the speeding law, he's merely saying that you were wrong in terms of the standard (which is the state law).
In the same way I can say that someone is wrong for say, stealing, since it's wrong according to my standards. Other people might not think that stealing is wrong, and I'm not attacking their beliefs, I'm merely voicing mine. "Tolerance" means that people are allowed to have their own opinions and voice them how they want, right?
Originally posted by clef360
I can judge that you have hair (or not, i don't know), or i can judge that you are a bassist, and that would be a judgement, right? So a "judgement" in this broad sense that you're using isn't necessarily a bad thing; it's just a statement of observation or fact.
don't confuse something being a morality issue with it being universal, those are two completely different things.
no, the term "wrong" when used in conjunction with behaviour is by definition a moral judgement, just as "right" is when used under the same conditions. ethics 101.
Originally posted by clef360
I can judge that you have hair (or not, i don't know), or i can judge that you are a bassist, and that would be a judgement, right? So a "judgement" in this broad sense that you're using isn't necessarily a bad thing; it's just a statement of observation or fact.
Originally posted by Mike Money
close it...