• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why do the session legends all use P basses? (SBL Video Discussion)

...a P is easy to work with...
Considering it was the only electric bass to work with for so long, it’s a well known quantity. The few times i’ve been in a studio i aways took my regular bass and borrow or buy a P bass to take as well. I always start with my regular bass, usually a jazz of some sort, and i’ve only been asked once to let them hear the P and even then they chose the jazz.
 
What we do now in the studio kind of isn't relevant in a thread about legendary players of the past. Of course, what's "past" is subject to dispute. To me, the legendary session players were the people doing studio work in the 60's and 70's and, to a limited extent, the 80's. After that, the total sound of a band became more important than the song. Bands were recording their own stuff, not being directed so much to play certain songs that other people wrote. Again, there are exceptions, always. Chris Squire was playing his Ric in the studio then, I do know that.

So everything I say in this thread is from that perspective. There's a whole lot more going on now, and studios are very different environments, not nearly as expensive, often in people's homes. The bass in some genres has a central role today, not like it used to be.
 
They just record really well, plain and simple. If you spent as much time as I have recording, you would understand.

Amen. 6 pages and here's the full gospel in this post. There are always exceptions for certain players and music styles but after 63 yrs of life on this planet, I've learned that the 80/20 rule is valid. In this case, 80% of the time a P bass will get the job done well. For J bass guys, bridge pickup off (or on a smidge) gets it done too.

Glad that I spent the last few hours practicing rather than following this thread. Happy new year to all of my fellow bass brothers!
 
SBL is a marketing company that also teaches bass lessons. And there a good one at that. They got all of you to watch the video.

It’s part of the new “anger economy”. I think shock jocks were the first people to really manipulate this. They learned that an angry listener was a loyal listener and would tell all of his friends.

There are multiple SBL videos titled “Why 5 Strings Suck”, and “ Why 6 Strings Suck”, and “Why Fretless Sucks”, Then you watch the video To discover that none of these things actually suck, there are just certain considerations that you have to have when playing them.

It’s really society’s fault in general, you can’t just tell people “hey here’s some information that you need to know about this thing” anymore. You have to appeal to the emotions. Everyone’s attention span is getting smaller but the demand for that attention is getting greater.
 
Amen. 6 pages and here's the full gospel in this post. There are always exceptions for certain players and music styles but after 63 yrs of life on this planet, I've learned that the 80/20 rule is valid. In this case, 80% of the time a P bass will get the job done well. For J bass guys, bridge pickup off (or on a smidge) gets it done too.

Glad that I spent the last few hours practicing rather than following this thread. Happy new year to all of my fellow bass brothers!

I would substitute the words "really well" for "predictably" and be very much in agreement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob_Ross and bass12
It’s part of the new “anger economy”. I think shock jocks were the first people to really manipulate this. They learned that an angry listener was a loyal listener and would tell all of his friends.

There are multiple SBL videos titled “Why 5 Strings Suck”, and “ Why 6 Strings Suck”, and “Why Fretless Sucks”, Then you watch the video To discover that none of these things actually suck, there are just certain considerations that you have to have when playing them.

It’s really society’s fault in general, you can’t just tell people “hey here’s some information that you need to know about this thing” anymore. You have to appeal to the emotions. Everyone’s attention span is getting smaller but the demand for that attention is getting greater.

although logical speculation, this is one of the best posts ive read on TB....thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBS-bass
Glad that I spent the last few hours practicing rather than following this thread. Happy new year to all of my fellow bass brothers!

lol, im recording some of my own stuff while replying in this thread....when i take a break from tracking, i minimize the screen and go on the net for a few minutes....its not like im sitting here salivating for responses :D
 
Haven't looked at the video but my first, instant thought was a flashback to every studio I ever walked into during the late '70's and early '80's. There was ALWAYS an old P bass sitting around in that studio. They were everywhere, they did the job, and engineers knew what was going to come out of them, which made things easy. I don't know what this guy has to say about it, but the sheer volume of units sold and their early ubiquitousness in the mass market is what I'm going with.

Now, does that make it the right tool for every job? Nope. I don't own one, I've never owned one, the closest I come is two non-Fender P/Js that I own. I picked up more than one of those studio Ps and put them right down again. Wasn't the right tool for me. Those guitars are probably worth five figures today, but I like my Jazz style necks. Go figure.

My p bass has a j neck.. So understand.. Thick necks aren't my favorite either..
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBS-bass
Amen. 6 pages and here's the full gospel in this post. There are always exceptions for certain players and music styles but after 63 yrs of life on this planet, I've learned that the 80/20 rule is valid. In this case, 80% of the time a P bass will get the job done well. For J bass guys, bridge pickup off (or on a smidge) gets it done too.

Glad that I spent the last few hours practicing rather than following this thread. Happy new year to all of my fellow bass brothers!
So you know more than Leo Fender did, 81 years of waste of time, at the end he was completely wrong. Poor Leo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schmo_bass
Geddy Lee, Joe Osborne, Adam Clayton, Verdine White, Marcus Miller, Victor Bailey, Larry Graham, John Paul Jones, Will Lee..... oh wait, they're all Jazz players.
Two, maybe three of the guys you listed are session players. Did you watch the video and listen to what Sean Hurley said?????
 
My opinion, a P style bass is the easiest way to fit a bass into the mix in a way that doesn't hinder other instruments. For most rock and pop styles, the bass is filling out the low end (up to around 250) and then some character and crunch around 1k. A P bass naturally has a nice low mid presence, and if you play it with a pick, provides a nice balanced tone. In the recording sessions I've done, I have always preferred the sound of my P (or PJ on neck) over most other basses I've tried.

I also think the massive drum kit rule applies. Theres less room to be flashy, more room to be solid, and less sonic range available. When I've worked with players who play 6ers or even some 5s, ive noticed that their playing is usually overlapping with either guitars, keys, or the deep end of the kick. Not saying you can't be awesome and solid on a 5 or 6 (see: Nolly), but my personal preference is that there isn't much of a need for more than 4.


Nolly may play 5-6 he's very mid based.. Not a lot of bass.. So he knows what works.. Plus those guitarist play Drop A and Drop C..
 
To make it simple, I'd say because a P bass was the 'standard' that is, unless you were the late Joe Osborn and his ancient and accepted J. At least Lakland 10th anniversary concert, I was so fortunate to ask mr. Jerry Scheff, why he had his Lakland signature bass loaded with lipstick pickups. He told me that when recording for Elvis or The Doors, etc, he liked the sound of the Danelectro or Jerry Jones. But when on stage, with Elvis, it was demanded that he play nothing but a P "Fender bass" Because that was the norm for Elvis. On camera, it had to be a Fender. Inside the studio walls, it could be what ever you wanted it to be.

Carol Kaye always played a P bass with exception of some Musicman or Gibson sessions, because that's what she started with .

That's my uneducated opinion. YMMV
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpaulb
It’s part of the new “anger economy”. I think shock jocks were the first people to really manipulate this. They learned that an angry listener was a loyal listener and would tell all of his friends.

There are multiple SBL videos titled “Why 5 Strings Suck”, and “ Why 6 Strings Suck”, and “Why Fretless Sucks”, Then you watch the video To discover that none of these things actually suck, there are just certain considerations that you have to have when playing them.

It’s really society’s fault in general, you can’t just tell people “hey here’s some information that you need to know about this thing” anymore. You have to appeal to the emotions. Everyone’s attention span is getting smaller but the demand for that attention is getting greater.

Scott (or whoever makes the titles for his videos) definitely uses clickbait titles but I don't think this video really qualifies. I own a 5-string Fender P but I don't really play it. I'm not angered at all that lots of studio engineers/producers would rather work with a P Bass than others.
 
Even the best sound engineers I know work under time pressure. They could probably spend 10 minutes messing around with settings to get your Alembic sounding like heaven, but they’d just as well spend 10 seconds on your P Bass and apply the savings towards drum mic setup.

Time is money and everyone likes money. Precision Basses save time.

If you can't make an Alembic sound good in the same time that you could a P bass, you're not much of an engineer. The onus there is on the player to have the bass sounding good. Alembic may have some complex electronics on-board but that doesn't change anything for the engineer. The Alembic is not an Enigma Machine that needs a book of ciphers to operate, as much as some luddites may enioy that idea.
 
Standard SBL video "script" goes something like this: "Here I am just getting home from the shops. Now here's my daughter - say hi to the viewers. Now I'm going into the kitchen. There's my wife doing something or other. Now I'm in another room and I've actually picked up a bass, but wait: my kid wants to watch TV in here, so let's go into yet another room where, OK, now we can actually talk about the thing the video title said we'd talk about. Wait, I forgot something, let me get it. OK, seems we're at the five-minute mark, so *now* we can talk about bass."

At that point there often is some useful information.

There are multiple SBL videos titled “Why 5 Strings Suck”, and “ Why 6 Strings Suck”, and “Why Fretless Sucks”, Then you watch the video To discover that none of these things actually suck
I don't bother watching the ones with over-the-top click-bait type titles. Obviously five-string and fretless don't suck, even when combined in one instrument, and obviously he's not really going to make that claim once he gets into the details.

So do *all* session legends use P basses? Of course not. But I think it's fair to say *most* session legends have a P bass as an option.