• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why I NEVER Vent On Here About Band Problems

I didn't read the entire thread so I apologize if this has been brought up or is irrelevant, but I think a lot of it comes down to respect - I try to treat all of my colleagues/bandmates/etc with respect regardless of who I am speaking to and whether they're around or not. I've posted about band gripes before and, minus one where it was totally bonkers and I knew I would quit if I didn't get fired first (I got fired first), I try to always frame it as "We are having a miscommunication" and never throw anyone under the bus. It's very easy to burn bridges, but it's also very easy not to.
 
Hi Jimmy :)

Finally! Page 11! :hyper:


The drummer has been fired, which makes me sad! I like him!

(I won 't take a drummer to a restaurant but still…:D)

The BL hired a guitarist who auditioned with a 10 W practice amp (the only one who wasn 't loud)

And the keyboarder who is vegan and doesn' t drink started to sample my sounds.


Rock & Roll stopped to smell funny! :D

thx for the thread!


Wise(b)ass
I'm the drummer. Do you know how hard it is to get fired all the time? It makes me sad, too. Plus, I was hungry. I promise not to pull on the table cloth again. Well, unless there's a whole lot of stuff on it and it sounds cool when it all hits the floor.

If it makes it to page 12, do I get the job back?
 
I'd rather not get involved, but I feel compelled to when folks are throwing around incorrect statements, usually based on "What I heard.".
What's worse is being dismissed when I have relevant information based on hands-on experience!

This is what kills me. There is so much mis-information out there to begin with, and people just can't be wrong ...
 
I believe JimmyM speaks the truth. Probably more truth than most of us can handle.

Regardless, I'm also a firm believer in discretion being the greater part of valor. I also don't like to air my dirty laundry in public, and I consider the Internet to be "public." And when I do contribute to anything here, I do my best to make my contribution meaningful, but I've slipped up and contributed to Internet dogpiles.
 
Can we pin this thread for eternity?

I admit that I enjoy reading band drama posts. But I rarely talk about my own band experiences because seriously are you crazy? I like getting calls. What happens on stage stays on stage. Heck yeah I get angry, but airing it in public could hurt the brand or, worse, make the phone ring less. But if you want to share, hey, cool, I enjoy it. It's your rep on the line, not mine.

I usually skip out on the threads when they start getting judgmental (so after the first response or two really). That's the internet. A dogpile of shame is only fun for those in the dogpile, so the devil's advocates bail, and the stoning continues with no serious opposition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Auspuff
One of Jimmy's core points deserves underlining: never post anything anywhere that you aren't prepared to have the whole world see, particularly the people you're kvetching about. It's likely that, sooner or later, they will. This is one reason that since the early days of the net I've been an advocate for using real names online — it makes me, and in my experience most people, more disciplined and responsible about what we say.
Amen.
 
Hey @JimmyM , good post. Lots of good points in it.
A few comments, just to clarify things...



I am the junior member of the band, but have been playing with them for well over 3 years now, so not sure if that still makes me new... ;)

LS is usually good, I wouldn't (and didn't) describe him as great.



Agreed. I knew I would get too many of those kinds of responses, but I'm good at separating the wheat from the chaff...



The vagaries of the internet... For all anyone knows I could be working in a Russian troll farm... lol...
nyet... ;)
Agreed, and sage advice. I am pretty anonymous here, now... When I first starting posting on here, I wasn't, so changed my profile a while ago, but your advice is still solid. I really don't think that anything I said is libelous, so I'm confident in standing behind my statements, and if they get back to the LS and they kick me out of the band, that's not the end of the world. I meant what I said... What others say may or may not be libelous, but that is out of my control...



Again, singer usually does a good job, not great... Rest of this part I agree with. So many folks jump to the nuclear option... :(



See my first comment about new guy...
For the first 3 years, and even to a large extent now, your description of what a new guy should do was me to a T. Even now, I still haven't raised this issue with the band, since I am not 100% sure if it is worth making waves over. Of course, it hasn't even been a week since the gig, so distance often gives perspective.



Not sure if this part was directed at me, but if so, it is not at all what I'm about. I think I fully understand my status in the band, and act accordingly. I am eminently replaceable. Having said that, after 3+ years in the band, I feel I can voice my opinion if I see something that needs addressing.



Yes, and again referencing a previous comment about wheat and chaff...
"Consider the source" is a motto I have been using a lot lately...

My main motivation for starting the thread I did was to vent, which may or may not have been constructive. But, it did solicit feedback from some that I found comforting and helpful, knowing that I'm not alone in feeling the way I did. A few grains of gold in a pan full of sediment...

In closing, thanks Jimmy for your unvarnished perspective. It is comments like yours that motivated me to start my thread in the first place, chaff be damned!
For what it's worth (which fair warning may be nothing), I thought you handled your thread with grace, thoughtfulness and aplomb throughout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ak56 and lat
Example 1:

Lazy sub drummer, bad gig (not humor)

Example 2:

Venting - LS can't handle playing in a bar that serves shots.

I had so many problems with the main band I used to be in for years to where every other gig ended with me leaving with an upset stomach, but in all that time, I never once commented on here how miserable an experience it was, who was doing what horrible thing to whom, or anything like that. And for the most part, I still don't. Anything I had to say about it on here was always positive and happy and never bad. The worst I might have said is how one of the major acts we backed up didn't want to hear anything but himself, which he always thought was funny. Why? Number one, commenting so negatively about co-workers you work with day in and day out is not only unprofessional, but if it gets back to them, it can totally lead to even worse problems. Number two, these two thread examples show what insane replies you can expect.

Shall we dissect them? Yes, let's...

Example 1 concerns a band of longtime pros getting a recommendation for a pro drummer to sub for a gig from a professional album producer two months out, only the drummer did absolutely no homework for the gig and pooped up the joint, and the BL reacted a little more publicly than he should have. Some people correctly realized that stuff happens once in a while, and the OP was just venting and wasn't looking for solutions, just a few "Been there done that" stories from us.

But every armchair quarterback who has likely never been in that position (and a few folks who should know better) chimed in with mostly finger pointing at the regular people in the band and the producer, calling THEM the unprofessional ones, and offering nothing in the way of solutions except completely unrealistic ones. Those of us who have been a longtime part of that world and know what it's like tried to set the record straight, only to keep getting shouted down by others who never existed in that world. And if you think this BL is unprofessional, I can tell you some stories, folks! Like or not, the BL calls the shots in his/her band, and if you don't like their behavior, they are never going to fire themselves.

Example 2 concerns a new bassist in a band of older players who's upset about the lead singer, who's usually been great, but who had too much to drink one night and got a little sloppy in a band where apparently everyone drinks on gigs but usually holds it together pretty well. Again, a few reasonable replies, but mostly a bunch of crap and nonsense about how this singer is a raging alcoholic, the bass player needs to confront him about it, and let him know that it's unacceptable. And in fine Talkbass tradition, there were a few replies that they need to fire the guy no questions asked.

First, the only thing anyone knows about this singer is what the new guy told us, which could be accurate or a gross misrepresentation of the facts and none of you would know the difference. The fact that so many people have diagnosed him as an alcoholic based on the bassist's OP makes me sick to my stomach, and it borders on libel. The OP needs to be extremely concerned about these comments adding up to libel, and he really needs to worry about it getting back to the rest of the band.

Second, the OP has said that the singer usually does a great job, but slipped this one night out of I don't know how many gigs they've done already, and didn't really start showing signs of slipping until later in the evening. The bar owner and staff were happy, the rest of the band didn't comment negatively about it, and the only one who seems unhappy is the OP, why may be justified in a little concern about a possible red flag. But of course, many people commented negatively about the singer's character as a human being, like any of them are perfect people who never ever did anything wrong in their lives. Spare me.

Third, let's examine the phrase "new guy" in more depth. Usually that means that you do less talking than listening, you be respectful of your new co-workers and try to assimilate into what they're already doing without making demands or pushing your own agenda until you've been there a good while, and if you don't like what's going on, then you either take a hike or you offer your opinion knowing full well that the end result could be them telling you to take a hike.

And some of you aren't going to like this, but while you might think you're extremely important to the success of a band with vocals as bassists (and make no mistake...some of you are), unless you can sing better than the lead singer and/or have a great ear for harmonies that they can't live without, you are not nearly as important as the lead singer, and even then you still may not be if they like him better than you. This goes double if you are the new guy, and it goes quadruple if you can't sing at all. And those of you who think it's OK to confront the lead singer in any way at this stage of the game are living in a world of delusion. Quit or keep quiet...those are a new guy's only two choices, and if you think otherwise, I dare you to try and prove me wrong.

Now add in the completely moronic barrage of replies to nearly every question on here with the advice to fire someone without any sort of rational analysis or thought of the repercussions ("Fire the drummer" is a joke on here now, but I remember when it wasn't), and now why you see why I always keep it light and never discuss any current issues I have with bands. I appreciate that there are some good and smart people on here who can offer up relevant and sage advice about how they handle certain situations. Some folks are extremely good at it. But I don't want so-called advice from inexperienced people who have never been outside of their house with a musical instrument, nor do I particularly care for advice from those who may be good experienced players but have never been in unique and uncommon performance situations such as what we have in example 1 or what I've done most of my career.

Sadly, I don't think it's ever going to change, though I keep hoping against hope. But if there's anything I can say to those who may recognize themselves as offenders on here to at least stem the tide a little, it would be these three things:

1. It's perfectly fine to have differences of opinion how to handle things, but truly consider what you're offering as advice, and make sure you've put at least a little thought into your replies.

2. We may all be equal in the eyes of the Lord or the law, but we are not all equal on the bandstand, so realize when you're out of your element. If you've never been in a situation someone is asking about, especially if it's regarding higher level performing situations than you've ever been a part of, you're best off to allow those who have been reply, and you just read and learn, otherwise you may do more harm than good.

3. Your words are public and easily searchable, so be very careful about the questions you ask or the comments you make when you start a thread, because I've seen it come back to bite people on the ass many times. It even came back on me once when I made what I thought was a comment that would never be seen by anyone but other bassists on an obscure bassist forum, and I was forced into damage control.

4. Everyone on here has egos to some degree, otherwise we wouldn't be here, and that is healthy and helps us do what we do without collapsing into a heap of self-doubt. But don't over-estimate the bass player's importance to the success of a project and give bad advice based on that very inaccurate assumption. Like it or not, pretty much all bands have pecking orders, and even the most democratic bands don't usually put bass players at number one unless they're the bandleader, and if you believe otherwise, you're fooling yourself.

5. NO ADVICE IS WAY BETTER THAN BAD ADVICE!

I posted this thread in the spirit of love and respect for those of you who share my love of playing music and entertaining people with the gift of music, and it's my sincere hope that all of you take it in that spirit, even if you might recognize yourself in some of these scenarios. But if you don't, all I can tell you is that if you think this post is bad, you should have seen my first and second drafts!!!

On an unrelated note: I believe you have to be an amazing bass player and since I live in Central Florida, I hope I get to see and hear you someday. I used to play out regularly (when I lived up north), but haven't in quite awhile. I don't get out much anymore, but have been shopping musicians to play with (or with whom to play)! Your insights apply to just about any profession, when it comes to not bad-mouthing your co-workers; especially in a public forum!
 
Brian Jones and Syd Barrett couldn't hold it together under any circumstances by then. Keith Moon, however, botched a handful of shows, but always did amazing work right up until the very end. And that is why Keith Richards is still in the Stones and Brian got the axe....Keith still held it together.
Its always been about Jagger/Richards....image, touring ability but mostly riffs and lyrics...The Stones will end once Jagger or Richards dies or retires, not sure about Charlie Watts.
 

Latest posts