• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wouldn't anyone play a metric bass?

I'm a big football fan and a soccer fan. Different sports entirely. I don't get the elitist attitudes of fans of either sport.

This is a peculiar human trait - the need to boost ourselves by decrying others. Football, religion, politics, skin colour, music style and so many other things are used to make us feel superior to others.
Whatever elite sport you have attained means that you have a combination of natural talent, incredible determination and hard work to get to where you are. I'm not a great fan of soccer but it's pointless to say it's not a worthwhile sport. I also don't care for country music either but there sure are some awesome country pickers out there so let's just do what we do and let others do what they do too.
 
Last edited:
Jokes aside, the metric system has been widely accepted in the US for a long time, its just not used for everything. I think a lot of it comes down to convenience whether its used or not.

For example, its easier to converse in imperial units since they have fewer syllables. Describing your height as "six-foot-two" is less effort than saying "one hundred eighty-eight centimeters". 'Mile marker' rolls off the tongue easier than 'kilometer marker', inch is easier to say than centimeter, etc. But at the same time, metric is always preferred in math, science and engineering since its base-10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: instrumentalist
Thing to be careful with is not using metric Allen keys (hex keys) on a non metric bass or vice versa...

Also what do you Americans call the non metric system? In the UK we call it the imperial system but given you weren't keen on our empire (well the taxes without an mp) I doubt you call it that
 
Anybody who does any kind of engineering in the USA automatically has the metric and SAE numbers in their head. 40 years with Mercedes Benz , Very seldom did I worry about conversion . It's like speaking a non native language . You don't have to think about it . If you know the language .

Exactly. In the USA we're very adept at using SAE and metric systems interchangeably. Both systems have merit, knowing both means being more knowledgeable than knowing just one.
 
Thing to be careful with is not using metric Allen keys (hex keys) on a non metric bass or vice versa...

Also what do you Americans call the non metric system? In the UK we call it the imperial system but given you weren't keen on our empire (well the taxes without an mp) I doubt you call it that

From Wiki...

SAE International, initially established as the Society of Automotive Engineers, is a U.S.-based, globally active professional association and standards developing organization for engineering professionals in various industries. Principal emphasis is placed on transport industries such as automotive, aerospace, and commercial vehicles.

"In the early 1900s there were dozens of automobile manufacturers in the United States, and many more worldwide. Auto manufacturers and parts companies joined trade groups that promoted business. A desire to solve common technical design problems and develop engineering standards was emerging. Engineers in the automobile business expressed a desire to have "free exchange of ideas" to expand their technical knowledge base."
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock
Thing to be careful with is not using metric Allen keys (hex keys) on a non metric bass or vice versa...

Good point, especially when working on tiny hex screws, like with guitars. It seems like the smaller allen keys and hex screws require more precise tolerances to obtain a good purchase. I often find myself mixing SAE and metric keys to get a snug fit on what should only require metric keys. Dunno if the keys are imprecise, or the screws, or both. No matter, it's not like we're working for NASA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock
PRESS RELEASE: The International Standards of Musical Measurements and Equivalents has announced today that the old standard of measuring string instruments in inches will be updated. Scientists at the European Centre for Calibration have redefined scale lengths in terms of vibrations of a single atom of Cesium, which oscillates at a frequency of a jillion times a second.

The new international unit of determining the scale length of a 'standard-size' bass (formerly known as 34 inches) will now be called: Shut Up.

Old Method:

Member of public: "Excuse me mister bass player; what scale length is that instrument you are currently playing?"

Experienced bassist: "This is a standard 34-inch bass. Thank you for inquiring."

New Method:

Mop: "Excuse me mister bass player; what scale length is that instrument you are currently playing?"

Eb: "Shut up."

END RELEASE
Note how the surly bassist in the second example not only used the new, less politically correct answer, but also had the blatant audacity to be referred to as "Eb", undoubtedly for his habit of down tuning one half step.
 
Just to play devil's advocate for a second. Imperial and metric are not better or worse than one another, these are just systems, it's the age old glass half empty or half full conundrum. I mean in the end it does not really matter, folks will use what they are most comfortable with. The real question is should you go short scale yes or no ;)
Quite agreed. In fact, the imperial units are all defined in terms of metric units, which in turn are defined in terms of physical constants -- as of last week when the kilogram was finally redefined. There was never a "standard inch" sitting in a vault somewhere. And I think we waited long enough to adopt the metric system, that it has ceased to matter because: a) stuff that matters is mostly in metric units now anyway, and b) machines can switch back and forth between imperial and metric units by pressing a button.

The problem with imperial units is all of the "weird" units, such as the numbered screw sizes, number drills, letter drills, wire gage, sheet metal gage, and so forth. Also, there are too many kinds of parts. While not caused by the unit system, manufacturers who switched to metric were often able to also reduce the sheer number of different parts that they had to keep in inventory, for instance by agreeing to use specific screw lengths and diameters. This has improved manufacturing.

Americans are doing just fine with the metric system in many areas. I don't think there are any imperial dimensions on a new bicycle or a new car. There are some hold-overs such as wheel diameters that don't matter because they only pertain to wheels. Likewise for bass necks. There's no reason for anybody to know the length of a bass neck unless they're buying a bass neck, so no reason to adopt metric dimensions.
 
This is spot on! String spacing is almost always seen in millimeters, while nut width, radius, scale length, etc. are usually in Imperial. That is an odd juxtaposition.

Funny enough, I can't make any sense of the fretboard radius and nut width with the imperial 9 5/8 whatevers, I need these figures translated to metric to make sense of them.
But when I read about a bass with a 89,7cm scale, I have to translate that to inches to get a feeling for it.
 
Sorry America, you lose!
The development of modern standards of measure has been an international effort for the better part of a century, and the US has served in either a leading role or as an equal collaborator in this work. Today, those standards are shared by everybody. There was nothing to win or lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock
The development of modern standards of measure has been an international effort for the better part of a century, and the US has served in either a leading role or as an equal collaborator in this work. Today, those standards are shared by everybody. There was nothing to win or lose.

I explained back in post #93 that it was a joke. Can we come down from DEFCON 5 please?