• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Big E speakers: Pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The tweeter switch---I don't understand it completely--influences the crossover on the mids. I'll have to find out details--but it does seem to remove some "smoothing" when the tweeter is turned off. The net effect is that the faital is using the entirety of its range---up to 8 k. But it's the quality of the mids that is different.Like I said---more of a "paper cone" sound all the way to 8k. It can be pushed into a really nice subtle break up. I elevated the cab turned off the tweeter, cranked it, and got one of the best Pbass rock sounds I've heard. But with detail up to 8k and not sounding like a "hifi" cab. Turned the tweet on and it cleaned up and sounded more like an Anthony Jackson hifi sound. The mids extend quite low, so when the phase reverse is engaged it changes the voicing a lot. Bass gets a bit thinner (more like some of the newer "punchier" hi end cabs. But the low bass stays the same. Using the tweet off switch I was able to get a very convincing early Music Man type of sound.

That's just the tweet on/off switch. There are 3 settings for the volume of the entire mid/tweet section.
0db--no pad---
in phase---stronger more R&B mid bass but with very present mids and highs
out of phase--Same B & E string but very flat in the mid and upper bass (as opposed to the built-in warmth of other MAS cabs) More in-your face mids and highs

-3db
in phase
warmer mid to upperbass than 0db more similar to other MAS cabs in this respect--neutral mids (flatter

out of phase
Very flat in the bass , mids, and highs---flattest setting ( funny thing is--the -6db out of phase setting measures the flattest---but this setting sounds the flattest to my ears--guess I like slightly elevated mids as a starting point)

-6db
in phase
warm, focused bass--less mids and highs---a bit more b15'y

out of phase--more of a sealed box rock sort of tone---especially if you turn the tweet off and turn your treble up a bit

These are initial observations. All I can say is that it's versatile---and functional in it's versatility. Seems a bit intimidating at first but gets more and more intuative.

Volume level is about the same as the 46 and 85 (very close to a single 15 or 410 and edging toward a 212.

Low end is by far the most extended of the Big E's.The new RachE waveguide as used here gives up about 5hz of -3db (now at about 39hz---still crazy low) for much stronger impact. While this cab can sound very hifi it's more about power and impact. The low end is super punchy with very little annoying "bloom" or "overhang". In some settings you can get the "bloom" but the notes stay very separate.

Efficiency is a bit less than the 85 (which is about 100db). I'd say still a strong 97db.

One thing we wanted to get with the 110 was the highest quality
"paper" cone sound as high as we could get . And rather than pushing the woofer into the mid area where it is flat enough but doesn't really shine we found a mid driver that goes quite low and quite high and is doing the "heavy lifting" as far as musical content and the 10 is doing the heavy lifting in the lows to free up the mid driver.

In comparing the 85 to the 110--it's pretty neat.

The 85 is---to me--- a very elegant speaker. Super flat but with lovely midrange definition. Plenty of big, warm bass without the extra warmth of the 46. You can get it to do nasty, but that's not its inherent voice. It's got that BIG E thing of being right there. It sounds really beautiful as 3rd says but will always cut through a mix. Big low end with good extension---but even below it's f3 point it doesn't unload, so the bass always stays focused. Uber hifi midrange definition.

While the 110 can do pretty and elegant there always seems to be an underlying power waiting to get out. Don't know how else to describe it. The 110 is about power and impact. Crazy low end but focused. And all of that versatility is not just about manipulating the frequency response---the cab seems to change its presentation. It just feels different. To me it doesn't seem to be like a "chameleon" that tries to do a bunch of things but doesn't excel at one--know what I mean?

Tom and Steve are admittedly two "wild and crazy guys" but they sure can't seem to keep still. They go nuts going over and over designs and implementation. They're even using crazy expensive "toroidal" inductors on the low pass which maintains power and impact on the low end.

I told them exactly what I was looking for. We picked out the drivers and they went to town. I couldn't be happier with the results.

And there is a 210 coming.

Mike does not use the term 110 Flex in this discussion, but it is what he is referring to. This is a pic of the prototype:

IMG_0926_zps8ba03d0a.jpg
 
Visited Mike a couple of Fridays ago. Before giving my overdue impressions of the cabs I tried, a disclaimer: the night before, I caught a show – Scott Lucas and the Married Men, in a little place called The Hideout. Great show, but it was insanely loud and I was right in the front, sans earplugs. Rather than move toward the back or step outside when it became painful, I stuck it out up front like a big numb-nut. My ears rang for days and when I showed up at Mike's the next morning I had the aural equivalent of a hangover. I was not at my best (ears ringing the whole while), and I probably showed my impairment in my playing (sorry, Mike!), but I'll do my best to relate that which still could be readily discerned.

I brought a four-string fretted and a five string fretless bass, along with a Mesa Walkabout head and my 4 Ohm Dr. Bass cab for a point of reference. (The well-documented wrongdoings of the nefarious Doctor aside, I've found it to be reliable and a good performer. The cab is 4 Ohms, loaded with 2 Faital Pro 12FH500 12s and a W6N8-120 mid/high driver – no tweeter – in a vertical arrangement.)

Big E cabs tried:
8x5 (non-Ciare tweets – forget the name)
2x5 (no tweet)
4x6.5 (in okume, Ciare tweet)
MAS 110 Flex (Ciare tweet).
We played them and the Dr. Bass with the Walkabout and with Mike's Puma 900.

All of the Big E cabs have more true low-end than the Dr. Bass. By comparison, the Dr. Bass, which to my ear has a fairly tight, articulate low end, has noticeably better low-end performance than an SVT 410. (I've played the two side-by-side; the DB goes lower and articulates better down low, though the SVT is a hair more efficient and sounds attractive in its own right. I especially liked it with an old GK 2000 RB, but that's another story!) The 8x5 rolls off noticeably lower than the Dr. Bass. The 4x6 goes a little lower yet and handles those B-string notes with more apparent ease. The 110 Flex goes a little lower again (or seems to, anyway) and handles the lowest notes in a manner that borders on shocking.

Transients: All of the cabs were articulate in slap and fingerstyle, but the 110 Flex (this is the shocking part) gave me the same pop on the E-string that I got on the G while slapping. Pretend you're listening to Louis Johnson play the bass solo from Stomp, and each note is a slice of cake: Each of the lower notes has a sharp, percussive part on top of a somewhat compressed midrange and low end. Spiky frosting on sponge cake (still yummy). Now pretend that that spike happens all the way down through the cake. All the parts of the note (treble, midrange, bass) “spike” together. Not sure how else to describe it. I slapped a bit on the B-string of Mike's Roscoe, but didn't have the courage to lay into it like the E. I can vouch for the effect down to an open E, though.

The older tweeters are really smooth and nice. The Ciares are better for slapping. If I remember right, harmonics have a little more pop with them, too.

The 8x5, the 4x6, and the Dr. Bass 2x12 were more efficient than the 110. Not sure how they compare in terms of max volume. We got pretty loud – a little louder than I was comfortable playing – but I didn't have it in me to push the cabs to their limits in this regard. The 4x6 and the 110 (and maybe the 8x5), though, would handle a bass-heavy, dubby sound better at volume than the Dr. Bass, IMO.

The voicing switches (phase between woofer and mid/tweet; -6, -3 and 0 dB padding on mid/tweet) on the 110 Flex have a noticable effect and the voicings are useful. That said, I think I'd leave it at “default” (-3 dB mids and tweeter, top and bottom in phase) 95% of the time.

Subjectively speaking, the midrange on the Okume 4x6 is good, the 110 Flex is better, and the 8x5 is best (or at least the prettiest). If I had to play one of those cabs in a funk band for the rest of my life, it would be the 110. If I had to accompany Joni Mitchell, it would be the 8x5. If I played five string and wanted to make the most of a 500 watt micro, it would be the 4x6. (Side note: the shape of the 8x5 is appealing -- footprint is *tiny* and it's relatively tall for its size.)

The little 2x5 does not go as loud as a good 12, but it handled more power than I thought it would from Mike's Puma (with Mike at the controls – I didn't want to do anything silly) with surprisingly good low end. And it really does fit in a medium-sized duffle (cajon case) that you can throw over your shoulder. Beautiful practice cab, would also handle a coffeehouse gig ably and work well atop a 4x5 or 6x5.

The “surround sound” effect of the cabs is especially pronounced outside. My Dr. Bass cab has good horizontal dispersion, but the sound still sounds like it's coming from a box. Much less so with the Big Es.

Mike and I talked about the 4x5/110 stack, but that didn't exist a couple of weeks ago!
 
Am I reading this right? A 2x8 will compete with a 1x15? And a 1x8 will compete with a 1x12?

I played a prototype 2x8" last year -- it was actually the cab I liked best, then. It's a bigger cab than the term "2x8" might seem to imply -- there is a lot of "box" for the amount of "speaker," and it's wide and low (you can turn it on its side to make it narrow and tall, but you'll lose some of the dispersion benefits of the design). It's been a year, so my my recollection might not be totally reliable, but I'd say it would compete favorably with most 15s, yes. I didn't know they made a 1x8!

When I played that cab (again, a year back), it was with a different bass and through a different amp -- the design was different back then, too, with the tweeter section firing into the vortex, if I understand correctly. There was something about the sound and feel of that cab that I really, really, dug, and it had the most articulate low end of any cab I'd played to that point. The 110 Flex, though, goes a good deal lower and, even a year apart, I could tell that it has noticeably more "muscle" down low than that 2x8 (again, an earlier version) did. It's narrower and a little taller, as well.

I think all of the current cabs go lower than that early, Faital-loaded 2x8 did, but Mike can confirm or correct this.

Are you looking for a cab to use with doublebass?
 
Thanks for posting your impressions, Mark. I hope your hearing has returned to normal!

Mostly.:hmm: Some people handle insanely loud sounds better than others. Despite my other super-human abilities (if I told you I'd have to, you know...), I don't appear to be one of them. I usually take a pair of musician's earplugs with me to shows, but I was traveling and this was unplanned. Still, I feel chagrined. I'm still fairly young and I use my ears to make a living -- not to mention that I derive a great deal of pleasure from being able to hear accurately! I don't need to muck about with my hearing like that.

Kids, don't be stupid.

Chagrin over, PSA ended, back to your regularly scheduled program.
 
Thanks, Mark--always a fun hang.

Actually, the 110 is pretty efficient. I'd say around 97db. The Dr. Bass is probably around 100. Which is really high. The 85 is about the same. The 46 is around 98.

Too bad that Dr. Bass can't get his shite together. I thought that his cab was well made and sounded good. Competitive with the better 212's out there. Very nice driver selection. I prefer the Big E's by a big margin but I wouldn't hesitate to compare his cab with the better ones out there.

The original 28 had the Faital 8PR200. Great mids but I couldn't eek out enough lows and overall volume. Weird footprint, though at 30 x 12 x 15deep.
 
Ok again

To get a reasonable starting point we go by the air volume displaced by the speaker. With conventional speakers it's the area of the cone times excursion max.

With the Big E due to the contribution of the rear wave you multiply by 2.5. To be a bit more conservative let's say 2.25

the 5" woofer has a Vd of 42cc's. That's how much air it can move. So times 2.25=94.5cc's

The 6 winds up being 165cc's

The 8 is a whopping 419cc's.


NOW--

a Kappalite 3012lf 12" woofer is 496

A Kappatile 3015lf 15" is a crazy 844

A Deltalite 10" (pretty much as big as you'll see in a 10) is only 147

So--an 8x10 cab will be around 1176 cc's

A super 12 cab is about 496

A super 15 cab is 844

A 210 is 294

A 410 is 588


OK to compare

a 45 (4x5) is 378

a 65 is 567

an 85 is 756

a 26 (2x6.5) is 330

a 46 is 660

a 66 is 990

a 28 is 838

a 48 is 1676


So to compete with a 410 you have

a 65

a 46


to compete with a super 12

a 65

a 46 is a lot louder


to compete with a super 15

an 85 will do it--I've had them head to head if you go with the 2.5 ratio it's 840cc's

a 28

the 46 comes close---again when you go with 2.5 it comes out to 733


to compete with a 610

a 28

a 66 will beat it

an 85 will be very close


to compete with an 810

two 65's

two 46's

a 48 will beat it pretty easily


to compete with a 212

a 66

a 28 will come close


to compete with a 215

a 48

two 46's are pretty close

these have proved pretty close to accurate in my experience. As far as the 10's---most are within these parameters. A small few 10" cabs use custom oem drivers that have Vd's of more than 147cc's. Not most, though.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Mike Arnopol : 02-13-2013 at 08:46 AM.

Am I reading this right? A 2x8 competes with a 1x15 and a 1x8 competes with a 1x12?
 
Yes-----a single 8 will compete with a 12. I think that a "super" 12 like the Fearless or Thunderchild will edge it by a small margin but it will keep up with your standard 12" bass cab.

Same for a 2 x 8 as far as keeping up with a single 15. Again---same caveat. A "super" 15 like the Thunderchild or Fearless will edge it by a small margin---but any other 15---no problem.

Right now I'm focusing on the 10" and 5" based cabs. I feel that while the midrange of the 6" cabs and 8" cabs is good---it's better on the 5" and 10" based cabs.
 
Very detailed and helpful reviews, thanks! Really looking forward to the unleashing of the 210 Flex beast.

The 110 was pretty insane. Don't know how close I got to its max volume, but at the fairly loud volumes we hit, it never even hinted at any strain, and the authority of delivery of the lowest notes was like nothing I'd heard before. Nix that -- at a DJ Shadow concert two years ago I heard and felt something like that out of his zillion dollar subs. Felt it in my intestines. It was like a sonic disruptor out of a movie. The 110... is not that loud. It might not go that low. But it goes lower, better than any bass cab I've ever heard.

So, yeah, the 210 should be beastly. Especially for its size.
 
Thank YOU, Mike. Next time I'm in Chicago I owe you a beer and one of those overgrown apple fritter/pancakes you talked about. I would've ordered one, but then I don't think I'd have made the drive home!

Thanks, Mark--always a fun hang.

Actually, the 110 is pretty efficient. I'd say around 97db. The Dr. Bass is probably around 100. Which is really high. The 85 is about the same. The 46 is around 98.

Too bad that Dr. Bass can't get his shite together. I thought that his cab was well made and sounded good. Competitive with the better 212's out there. Very nice driver selection. I prefer the Big E's by a big margin but I wouldn't hesitate to compare his cab with the better ones out there.

The original 28 had the Faital 8PR200. Great mids but I couldn't eek out enough lows and overall volume. Weird footprint, though at 30 x 12 x 15deep.

To be clear, while I like my Dr. Bass cab, it does not do what the Big E cabs do. In my apartment, it sounds smooth and wonderful. On stage, I think it does better than any of the cabs you can find at your area Guitar Center or that I encounter as backline in my modest rounds. Next to the Big Es, it sounded a little ganky in the mids and thin down low. More than that, the presentation of the sound is different -- markedly so, and I, too, prefer the Big Es in this regard.

Difference in efficiency wasn't that much. The 110 needed a little nudge on the volume knob when switching between it and the other cabs. The return is this astounding, articulate low end.
 
Hey Tom - can't you give it a lab test?
Take some measurements. Compared to measurements of other cabs?

Playing it is one indicator, but potential real world performance also comes out in the measurements.

Real world performance occurs in the real world in my experience but I welcome any measurements Tom would like to make.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.