I know a lot about what I am about to ask can be personal and based on one’s needs... but I'll ask anyways since it's all opinions! lol I'm also struggling to choose between 4 or 5 strings. I am very comfortable playing both, so that doesn't help!
I have an awesome 3x LS Dingwall but have been wanting a PJ Dingwall as well. Those of you that have or have owned a PJ Dingwall, first, has it been a 5 or 4 and why?
-and if so, 'can' they cop out a vintage tone if you want one or are they still very modern, hi-fi, etc.? Would I gain much (more versatile, less, better playability, etc) from a PJ if I already have a 3x Lee Sklar?
-Would you 'recommend' a 4 string to complement what I have or is a 5 str. the way to go from a sonic/playability/future point?
Super P(J) can do vintage and more modern. It's a clearer tone than you get from a "traditional" P in my experience, but can easily cop retro-inspired sounds by altering hand position, tone control, or using a foam mute.
I look at the 5 string as a 4 plus 1. It can do everything the 4 can, but with an added string. I know that seems super obvious, but there's really no difference in playability. You still get 19mm string spacing on the 5 string just like you do on a 4 string. The neck is wider/thicker than ABs/Zs/Primas/Sklars but not in any way uncomfortable. Again, just different!
You might not "need" the low B on a Super P since you've got a Sklar. I feel like most gigs that "need" a 5 or low B tend to be open to more "modern" basses like the Sklar.
Either way, you can't go wrong. With a Sklar, I'd personally default to that over a Super if I was relying a lot on the low B, so I think I'd lean more towards a 4 string.
