I guess it's easy to dispense advise like this if you're unaware of the physical challenges some of us face.
Very easy.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I guess it's easy to dispense advise like this if you're unaware of the physical challenges some of us face.
Hi Jason, I actually have a load-in that is far enough that the only way I can make it is to use the cab as a walker. I realize not everybody needs this, but I was in a near-fatal MC wreck 8 years ago that didn't help my 'long-distance perambulation'.....I still say everyone should have a quality collapsible hand truck, and get rid of their cumbersome casters....
Sounds like a Kart-a-Bag. I've been using mine since the mid-1980's.
Honestly, my Aguilar GS212 weighed in at about 71 lbs. and I always found it a breeze to move around, so I stick with my theory that anything under 75lbs. is lightweight. And at 46 I'm am starting to feel the weight more and more.
I've been following this thread, and I just ordered a new UL-112 from MF. Is this cab going to be the heavier version, and if so how much more will it weigh?
DOH! You're right. I musta' had Sadowsky on my mind.Sounds like a Kart-a-Bag. I've been using mine since the mid-1980's.
+1That 75lb light-weight threshold figure will continue to decline as the years pass, gym membership or no gym membership. It may not even be based on whether you still can handle the weight, but whether you will still want to tolerate heavier schleps.![]()
That's such a small cab I can't imagine it being much. I wouldn't be worried about it at all. I'm guessing there's about 1/2 the wood in that cab, and 1/2 or less the batting, so I'd put the max increase at 3 pounds or maybe less by extrapolation. Due to that and the size of that cab combined, I bet that wouldn't bug anybody... no matter how weight-sensitive they are.I've been following this thread, and I just ordered a new UL-112 from MF. Is this cab going to be the heavier version, and if so how much more will it weigh?
I guess it's easy to dispense advise like this if you're unaware of the physical challenges some of us face.
Yeah, if folks are doing that, it's definitely wrong. I personally don't know anyone who's been quite that fickle, but I'm sure they're out there, and it's foolish for sure. Tone comes first. Always. Even if it means you get heavier gear and just make sure you can get the help you need with it.I was only making the point that I see some people here drop their beloved cabinet like a bad habit because someone has come out with a cab that weighs a few pounds less assuming that this must be a better cabinet.
Good point.What about making sustainable choices when it comes to the environment? ...
Good point. My BergAE410 has a very light gage grill and I notice that if I tap on it, it makes a nice ringing tone that actually sustains a bit. I have been wondering if that will show up at certain frequencies during playing. I haven't heard any yet, but it may be noticable in a studio situation. I actually wish it had a little tougher grill with more metal surface area.That heavier grill might not just be for speaker protection but also to stop it resonating...
I've seen this with lighter grills before. The Neox grills are also fairly light gauge, but without having asked about this, I think they solved the ringing problem by curving the bezels on the top and bottom of the baffle, and then securing the grill to that. It's a very slight curve, nothing much, but it gives the grill an extra rigidness, along with a rubber plug between the two drivers. The same approach could be taken with a 410 I think.Good point. My BergAE410 has a very light gage grill and I notice that if I tap on it, it makes a nice ringing tone that actually sustains a bit. I have been wondering if that will show up at certain frequencies during playing. I haven't heard any yet, but it may be noticable in a studio situation. I actually wish it had a little tougher grill with more metal surface area.
What about making sustainable choices when it comes to the environment? Apart from the wood issue, the change to the internal material to meet EU standards seems very different to me. I would always be willing to carry a few extra pounds (and I really care a lot about weight) in order to know that the products I use meet the Kyoto Protocol standards. (As I side note I am just assuming this is the case, I really don't know what EU standards we are talking about, but it seems more dramatic when I site the Kyoto Protocol.)
+1... but it's a slippery slope here IMO. Ignore the 410UL... does ANYONE like the 210UL(II) or the 310UL(II) better than the B&C loaded Series I'sI would doubt it.
Not good. I've just been to their website - no changes to the description of building materials or weight specs - yet.So technically they're also willingly misrepresenting some of their products in their favor and against their customers'. At the prices they charge, I'm not cutting them any slack for this.
What should they call this series, "Series 2B" or "2H"?![]()