Looks great. As you are using a SM9.2 too; how does the Magellan-800 perform compared to the SM9.2 ?
First, I am not gigging at the present, so I have not played the MG 800 it in a live situation. But, IMO, the MG-800 Clean Channel is awesome. For now I prefer the B Contour and set it about 11:00. I can get a really nice fat tone that has this helf to the note that others have also noted. Plus, it was fairly easy for me to get a tone I likes with the Clean Channel.
I like the Clean Channel so much, I really haven't toyed with the Dive Channel very much. At this point, I prefer the tone I get with my SM 9.2 Tube Channel over the MG-800 Drive Channel. I'm not saying the SM 9.2 Tube Channel is better than The MG-800 Drive Channel. It's just that I have enjoyed the MG's Clean Channel so much

I haven't taken the time to tweaked the MG Drive Channel to my liking yet. I'm sure once I do, I'll be very happy w/ it.
Discussing differences, amps, cabs, basses, in tone is not my forte. Others here on TB can and will do a better job at describing the differences than I will. I will say, I'm loving the Magellan 800, but, my SM 9.2 isn't going anywhere. It makes one hell of a nice backup amp!
