• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Moral dilemma...

You might be right about that. But, I still contend that if a store forgot to charge me $250 for a particular item there would be many a "HEELZ YEAH!" yelled that day after which I would buy a Iron Ether Proton :p.

I'm pretty sure you mean the 3leaf Audio Proton.

:D

Good on ya IM for doing the right thing.

I'm with those that say Karma is a harsh mistress.

Knowing my luck I'd install the free $250 item,...and the next day my $250,000 house would burn down (okay I don't live in nor own a house).

I'd be interested to know what the reaction was from the store.

Theft of any kind is not good, even if you feel like the "victim" deserves it. Ultimately you are hurting your fellow consumer. These corporations protect their profits well and even if they budget for shrinkage; who do you foots that bill; the company or the consumer?
 
So, if you had been overcharged $250, you would have chalked it up to good luck for Home Depot and been on your merry way?

If I spot it, I'd go back and try to get my money back. If I don't manage to spot it, tough luck for me. Similarly, the store guys should've spotted not having charged the OP for that. They didn't, tough luck for them.

Again, if I'm overcharged, I doubt if any store employee would be honest enough to tell me that later on and pay me back, even if he/she does manage to spot this fact.

I've been on the wrong side of such incidents numerous times, so all of the above thoughts are my personal opinions. These are, in no way, indicative of what's morally correct. Maybe other people on this thread don't get embittered so easily and support morals irrespective of whether they've been wronged or not. Sadly, I'm not one of them. I can only go so far in my quest to be morally correct.

Ah well, I suppose I can't win everyone over with just charm, good looks and proper grammar (most of the time anyway) :bawl:

FWIW, at least I'm with you on the issues on this thread :p
 
Be part of the good in the world and return it and pay. Just my ¢2.

There are so many good people anyway. I know some that are so good that there need to be really bad people to compensate!

And on the whole matter I am with Kwesi. And either the people that think the same don't dare stating their opinion or some people in this thread is lying to us and maybe themselves, because it can't be true that only 2 people writing are selfish bastards that will keep the money the people so stupidly drop into your hands.

I would start shopping more in the store when the same cashier is at work hopping more money would come my way!
 
Frankly, I couldn't care less who's fault it was, lol. My thoughts: "Just got a $250 item for free and successfully got out of the store without being chased. WINNING!"

And there's always my three favorite words ever for damn near any dishonest situation: "Who's gonna know?" :D

That said, I would shop at another hardware store for the next two weeks or so, lol.

Seriously, were you drunk when you posted this? It sounds like a 14 year old after 3 beers, complete with "lol's".

Prince had it right..... There actually are thieves in the temple tonight.

Astounding.....
 
Seriously, were you drunk when you posted this? It sounds like a 14 year old after 3 beers, complete with "lol's".

Prince had it right..... There actually are thieves in the temple tonight.

Astounding.....

Aw, love you too!

Anyway, I have to meet these 14 year olds, the few I know are just plain annoying. Besides that, I get the impression that you haven't the typings of many drunk people. As far as the "lols" go, I usually try to limit them to two per post - you know, don't want to oversaturate or anything. And I'm much more surprised that you're surprised that there are people wouldn't wouldn't think twice about their good fortune in that instance. There are already others who have commented in this thread
 
Your stance just caught me off guard more than anything, Kwesi. I more thought you, like I said, level-headed than that. But I'm not one to impose my sense of morality on another person. I think it's stealing, you don't. We don't see eye to eye, and we won't convince each other otherwise.
 
Your stance just caught me off guard more than anything, Kwesi. I more thought you, like I said, level-headed than that. But I'm not one to impose my sense of morality on another person. I think it's stealing, you don't. We don't see eye to eye, and we won't convince each other otherwise.

Well you're half right. I know it's theft, I just don't care. Not that I've made myself look any better but I thought it was worth clarifying.
 
Judge not lest ye be judged, we are talking about a 'non malice of forethought' $250 mistake here, not The Great Train Robbery. If you want to attribute blame for serious crimes, start at the top, with those who get away with it everyday, the one's we are supposed to look to for guidance, and careful you don't fall offa that horse.
 
There's no moral dilemma here. If you HAVE morals.

The question is: What are you going to do about it?

Ignore the ripple effect?. Take the cash and the receipt back and pay?. Maybe someone loses their job and a family ends up homeless over an honest mistake. The big orange box despite being an employee owned company, ain't exactly famous for being a kind, understanding employer.

That might be a moral dilemma worth discussion but whether or not you are morally entitled to benefit from the error?

C'mon. Really.:rolleyes:
 

Latest posts