Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Precision "upgrades" that should be stock on new model - poll
- Thread starter MarkoYYZ
- Start date
Meh...the only thing that I found useful when I tricked out my American Precision was having the A Style Hipshot bridge, everything else was cosmetic, detracted, or didn't make any difference to the playability of the bass.
Also, Seymour Duncan Quarter Pounders seem to be the go-to pick up upgrade I see on a lot of rock precisions.
I would like a tilted-back headstock with a nice volute and eliminate the need for a string tree at all.
Last edited:
A. Properly cut nut from the factory
B. Truss rod wheel adjust at heel (except reissue models)
C. Properly dressed frets
D. Proper 1.75" nut width, but shallow front-to-back, like the early Fullerton VS '62 P
E. Good pots with proper taper so they work incrementally across the whole range.
B. Truss rod wheel adjust at heel (except reissue models)
C. Properly dressed frets
D. Proper 1.75" nut width, but shallow front-to-back, like the early Fullerton VS '62 P
E. Good pots with proper taper so they work incrementally across the whole range.
Weird thread. I've never found P bass string trees to be even remotely inconvenient, and I've never had any particular problem with the A string. And as far as I know, the only "rule" about how many wraps should go around the post is this: they shouldn't overlap, and if you have less than 2, you start running the risk of having the string slip.
Drop D tuners and truss wheels are great inventions, but are hardly requirements. I'm not a fan of tilt headstocks; they are more fragile. A straight headstock and a string tree is a much sturdier solution. There are string trees that are a nuisance, but the P bass tree is not one of them.
Drop D tuners and truss wheels are great inventions, but are hardly requirements. I'm not a fan of tilt headstocks; they are more fragile. A straight headstock and a string tree is a much sturdier solution. There are string trees that are a nuisance, but the P bass tree is not one of them.
Out of all the ideas in this thread, the one I like best is to ship P basses with flatwounds from the factory. I don't like flatwounds at all, but this suggestion makes some sense to me. Flatwounds sound good when other people use them; they just don't work for me.
Fix the dead spot. Somebody please figure it out and fix it. Please. Headless? So be it. Make it happen.
But you shouldn't have to. Fender should fix their own design flaws. lol
You can't fix a dead spot. It's to do with resonance & varies from body to body. EVERY bass has a dead spot, you just have to find it. Some of them just might be on a note that's off either end of the fingerboard.
I hear you. People change strings on a new bass anyways so it doesn't really affect people too much.
Having flats as an option makes sense if you're ordering factory direct - which will soon be possible with Fender - but it doesn't make sense from a retail standpoint, as stores don't want to be re-stringing instruments to customer's wishes, and Fender needs to put some strings on in order to properly set up the instrument before it goes out.
I was thinking of more mechanical "changes" that a lot of people would want stock, rather than have to get out a screwdriver to change, as the majority of people aren't "tweakers" like some of us. Even something as simple as a new string tree may be a big deal, and if a new 3-string tree/guide is put forward of the A string tuner, would leave a useless little hole in the middle of the headstock.
I guess covers would have been a good option and should be from the factory. I was thinking matching painted headstocks as well, but the poll only allows 10 choices.
I agree with the adjustable string spacing on the bridge - roller bridge probably.
.
I was thinking of more mechanical "changes" that a lot of people would want stock, rather than have to get out a screwdriver to change, as the majority of people aren't "tweakers" like some of us. Even something as simple as a new string tree may be a big deal, and if a new 3-string tree/guide is put forward of the A string tuner, would leave a useless little hole in the middle of the headstock.
I guess covers would have been a good option and should be from the factory. I was thinking matching painted headstocks as well, but the poll only allows 10 choices.
I agree with the adjustable string spacing on the bridge - roller bridge probably.
.
I know exactly what it is. I'm intimately familiar with them. I have three basses (out of seven) which absolutely do not have them. Of those one is headless, one is carbon 35" and one is a wooden five string. All of my Fender style basses have them including one which is carbon. Seems to point at the Fender style headstock as a culprit. Fix it.
Aside from making it a little thicker, or tweaking the shape of the sculpting from neck to head (the volute?), I think that any such request will fall on some very deaf ears.
With all the copies, that headstock shape (with a Fender logo), is the primary thing that defines it as a Fender.
.
