TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's a nice headstock. I very much like the 2-2 headstocks. My old ibanez had one and my current guild as well. Problem is finding cheap gigbags that fit. They all seem to be made for FSO'sThe absolute coolest headstock shape IMO:
View attachment 4444490
(Though I'd prefer headless every time.)
That dude's web site is a trip.Lord help me, I kinda want a Wishbass.
The pickup placement doesn't look far off from a Jazz, but yeah it's a slightly offset body with semi classic fenderish style, that to me doesn't really seem fenderish at all. I think thats a standard Warwick body style, just with a pickguard, and I don't care for it myself. I'm a big fan of oddball and less popular body styles, but not feeling that one.
I don't mind the Fender headstock, it's not ugly IMO, but it's not awesome. I'm not crazy about many 2+2 headstock. To me, Reverend guitars and Rickenbacker are the nicest looking headstocks in the larger production category. Firebird headstock are probably my favorite overall, Tbirds on the otherhand are nice, but way oversized.
I like it, but man - he makes that bass look tiny.Would others please weigh in on this random question???…
Saw Metallica live for the 8th and 9th time recently and notice Trujillo was playing a Warwick (not surprising since he’s sponsored by them or endorses their $tuff), but this thing almost looks like a Warwick did it with a Fender Jazz bass (like it ganked half of another bass’s pick guard as it slept)…
I assume that was the intent-modern bass mixed with a more “traditional “ pickguard, but this kinda bothers me aesthetically just a little bit for some reason:
View attachment 4444264
So…Am I wrong here, or is that bass just kinda…Weird looking???
It’s like I sorta understand they were attempting to combine a modern styling of a Warwick with a more “vintage”/traditional instrument, but it’s like I can’t unsee it…
Something about the Warwick neck on what almost looks like half a Fender Jazz pick guard…
Just wondering what level of blasphemy it may or may not qualify for when you put half a pick guard on a modern bass that isn’t typically designed for that look…
I get that looks don’t matter as much as sound, but there’s a lot of shapes, sizes, and color combinations out there and not sure I’m a fan of this thing…
It’s kinda like I want to like the looks of it, but can’t quite get onboard with it…
Thoughts anyone???
Thanks! \m/

—————————-Hope you're all well <3
————————————-I like it, but man - he makes that bass look tiny.
Anybody have thoughts on the Musket fuzz? Always wanted one, though I have no specific need. If you can compare it to the Pharaoh Supreme or Swollen Pickle, even better. Thinking I may have to snatch one some day, as it used to be a go-to for all sorts of people. Still looking to find my Muff/clone-alternatives.
MORE flexible than the Swollen Pickle? Dang. Sounds intimidating.I don’t have the exact musket circuit, but the Blunderbuss, which is a version they did with Ge and Si transistors. I used mine for both guitar and bass, as well as my old Swollen Pickle. Comparatively, the Musket/Blunderbuss is way more flexible and can cover the same ground as the Swollen Pickle of you dial it in right. If you can find one, get it.
Also, this is some good Sabbath worship, methinks: