• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Official MTD USA Thread

Heck, I'm still hoping he gets a better U.S. distributor. :D (My understanding is he's going with the same folks who handle his import line...but by no means do I have the full inside skinny.) These strings - at least the six-string set with the .135 'B' - are either feast or famine in my neck of the woods. I tend to stock up when they're in, but there have been a couple of times in the past year where I've had to resort to using other brands.

Yup, I'm pretty much hooked on his strings on his basses - amazing combination


So tell us, oh great sage and seer, or is it still a trade secret?

Cheers,
Cameron
 
So tell us, oh great sage and seer, or is it still a trade secret?

I'll wait for the official word to come down from on high, but this happened during Summer NAMM, and I was hanging around with Michael at lot down in Nashville. I will say that it is a move that makes a lot of sense for all involved (though I'm sure Michael would have preferred for things to go better for the Canadian distributor).

Tom.
 
I'm very glad to see that the thread is opening to the 4th part :)
when I've started it I would never immagine to see that it will go this far..

keep on posting your beautiful basses and all the great info's that you've been doing so far!

Invalid Link Removed

That looks like an avadore body, is that correct?

Of the five I currently own and the two that I sold or traded, my avadore bodied 535 is the one with the perfect tone. Do you find this is the case for you as well?
 
I'll wait for the official word to come down from on high, but this happened during Summer NAMM, and I was hanging around with Michael at lot down in Nashville. I will say that it is a move that makes a lot of sense for all involved (though I'm sure Michael would have preferred for things to go better for the Canadian distributor).

Tom.
It is official, it was announced in some of the trade mags -you can spill the beans.

BTW, still have a very unique MTD for sale:

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
That looks like an avadore body, is that correct?

Of the five I currently own and the two that I sold or traded, my avadore bodied 535 is the one with the perfect tone. Do you find this is the case for you as well?
+1

I find my 24 fret 535 with redwood on avodire [or avadore] and wenge/wenge neck/fingerboard has a perfect tone! The avadore on my bass looks very much like mahogany but weighs much less.

th_MTD-Body1web.jpg
 
Two weeks until delivery:hyper: Ash/Ash/BEM
Invalid Link Removed

that make me dread this thread.

Gorgeous, man.

And you know, I know Michael is against 'shiny stuff' on his basses, but my Marilyn has developed a shiny spot where my finger touches the top when I slap, and this has led me to think two things:

1) His finish could be buffed out

2) Maybe he could put a slightly thicker coat on the top only, and buff it out, that way you'd have 'shiny stuff' where it shows when you're playing, and it wouldn't affect the sound too much.

Just a thought. And what is BEM?

Cheers,
Cameron
 
that make me dread this thread.

Gorgeous, man.

And you know, I know Michael is against 'shiny stuff' on his basses, but my Marilyn has developed a shiny spot where my finger touches the top when I slap, and this has led me to think two things:

1) His finish could be buffed out

2) Maybe he could put a slightly thicker coat on the top only, and buff it out, that way you'd have 'shiny stuff' where it shows when you're playing, and it wouldn't affect the sound too much.

Just a thought. And what is BEM?

Cheers,
Cameron

Mike was sure to note that this bass was still wet in the photo.

BEM= Birdseye Maple fingerboard
 
...I know Michael is against 'shiny stuff' on his basses, but my Marilyn has developed a shiny spot where my finger touches the top when I slap, and this has led me to think two things:

1) His finish could be buffed out

2) Maybe he could put a slightly thicker coat on the top only, and buff it out, that way you'd have 'shiny stuff' where it shows when you're playing, and it wouldn't affect the sound too much.
It's not so much he's against shiny finishes as much as he is against thick finishes, and the best way to get a nice deep gloss finish is to make it kinda' thick.

That said, his finish is poly, and yes, it can be made shiny, but it is thin, so I'd advise against any aggressive buffing attempt. However, he's mentioned that you can use "butcher's wax" on his finishes, which will end up making the whole bass glossier over time. Jonathan Starr has done this before and it really does work. It won't give you a deep gloss, but it will bring out the colors a little more (tho it will also take away the "wood feel" of the top as it will be smoother.)

Personally, I think they do look kinda' nice that way, but I also dig the standard look, and despite the glossy spots, which are guaranteed to be there after a certain amount of playing, I still prefer to leave the overall finishes alone.
 
Totally and completely amazing... when you get that bass I'd like to see some macro pics of that top... :) 635, right?

Yes. It's a 635. I find MTD's to be the ultimate inspiration for me. I am very passionate about these instruments and each one is special. Unfortunately, I have sold some in the past and DEEPLY regret it. However, I am now on the neck-thru waitlist and will be creating the ultimate MTD beast soon.
 
What are the specs of your future neck-through?

All I know is that it will be a 635. Aside from that I will allow Mike to create a masterpiece. I don't even want to know the specs beforehand. I want a bass that reflects his experience, masterful skill, and mental state at this moment in time. I'm willing to pay more if he finds a "magical" wood somewhere. However, I want him to be free to create.