TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
LOL... OK.I did a search and "typical talkbass" was used a total of four times in 2018.

how about when anyone asks a technical answerable question talkbass is the friendliest place around. But when you express an unpopular opinion, cue the hate and the trolls who try to prempt themselves by calling the OP a troll. Everyone is an expert here with few students, so anytime you ask the experts something, they know the answer even if a million different ones from a million different experts. But say something that is against the grain, and prepare for warfare. For example, my thread about high tension being an arbitrary quirk of stringed instruments evolution/history was about a simple technical subject, but the level of emotion, trolling and vitriol made one think it was a Israel vs palestine. Granted, i should have ignored the trolls, as they dragged my into the negativity cycle. But why is such a benign topic so prone to anger? Because everyone is an expert, and experts are the ideal, so say something they don't like and you must be a disabled troll, because trolls are going for an emotion reaction, and that's exactly what happened, so it must be your fault. I have had two threads closed like this, one about amps, another about tension, both are technical topics, and both angered the experts so much that they had to be closed.
how about when anyone asks a technical answerable question talkbass is the friendliest place around. But when you express an unpopular opinion, cue the hate and the trolls who try to prempt themselves by calling the OP a troll. Everyone is an expert here with few students, so anytime you ask the experts something, they know the answer even if a million different ones from a million different experts. But say something that is against the grain, and prepare for warfare. For example, my thread about high tension being an arbitrary quirk of stringed instruments evolution/history was about a simple technical subject, but the level of emotion, trolling and vitriol made one think it was a Israel vs palestine. Granted, i should have ignored the trolls, as they dragged my into the negativity cycle. But why is such a benign topic so prone to anger? Because everyone is an expert, and experts are the ideal, so say something they don't like and you must be a disabled troll, because trolls are going for an emotion reaction, and that's exactly what happened, so it must be your fault. I have had two threads closed like this, one about amps, another about tension, both are technical topics, and both angered the experts so much that they had to be closed.
Atypical talkbass !!!Guilty.
Not always happy on my birthday, but I am today so I figured WTH...

I have only witnessed the belittling sarcastic replies when the OP starts a thread with an intriguing but totally incomprehensible statement or question or neither or both, due to either very poor grammar or intoxication, or perhaps sadly through a failed attempt at translation software turning something like, "how should I eq my SVT in a small room" into something like "how should ed stamp because I did"I think typical talkbass is a mob mentality when an innocent question gets jumped on and OP is belittled and sarcastic replies are given
When you give an opinion, but present it as fact, and then talk down to people who disagree, those people will react.
Is one of these the thread where physics got into the mix as part of a righty/lefty flip of the bass? I recall that, and the thread finally degenerated into a he said/he said brouhaha over the physics does not make sense/does too. But no one ever explained how/why the physics did or did not make sense.
That, in the big picture, is a minor quibble. But the banning of Nobody is a mortal blow.
I have only witnessed the belittling sarcastic replies when the OP starts a thread with an intriguing but totally incomprehensible statement or question or neither or both, due to either very poor grammar or intoxication, or perhaps sadly through a failed attempt at translation software turning something like, "how should I eq my SVT in a small room" into something like "how should ed stamp because I did"
And too be fair, a lot of those sarcastic responses are clever entertaining or downright hilarious.
I agree, that's why I only give opinions as opinions and facts as facts. The problem is when people get offended and triggered by an opinion they don't like, then strawman it by saying things like "when you present opinion as fact". But thank you for proving my point, mr. expert.
You presented your tension "opinion" as fact ("factual information"). You refused to accept that others might not agree. I was neither triggered or offended. But by definition, when you give an opinion, those who don't agree are not wrong, which you refused to accept.
You presented your tension "opinion" as fact ("factual information"). You refused to accept that others might not agree. I was neither triggered or offended. But by definition, when you give an opinion, those who don't agree are not wrong, which you refused to accept.
Guess you have no sense of humor or the ability to read the thread, in which I said i was being facetious. And thank you sir for proving my point again. Booyah.