devnulljp
Supporting Member
And this man is wearing a skirt of some kindon the topic of wizards from books so did Gandalf
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And this man is wearing a skirt of some kindon the topic of wizards from books so did Gandalf
And this man is wearing a skirt of some kind
![]()
Yes sir, I like to wear what I am comfortable in and I respect anyone else's right to do the same.I still think it's weird that a piece of cloth can be seen as "for men" or "for women" anyway.
Wear what you like, whether it's jeans and a T-shirt or high heels and a tutu, I don't care.
Anyone that has a problem with what other people do or wear is a doofus IMO.
I ain't even transgendered or gay
You'll approve their lifestyle, except when there's legally bonding paperwork asssociated with their lifestyle? That just sounds like you're a hypocrit, then.OK, I get that. So, lets say I have a deli and a homosexual couple comes in and orders sandwiches and are very loyal customers. I make them sandwiches and actually enjoy talking to them. But then one day they ask me to cater their wedding and the event violates my religious beliefs, and I am taught to not participate in such events.
I'm not discriminating against them when I deny. I've proved it by serving them sandwiches for a long time. Rather, I'm refusing to take part in an event to avoid violating my religious convictions. The first amendment protects my right to NOT participate in something that violates my religious beliefs.
Does that not seem reasonable?
Or are you saying that a person with religious convictions must not be allowed to put food on the table by owning their own business. That sounds kinda in violation of the first amendment.
I hear you. If anyone goes to the lobby they can see how I feel about a certain subject that we should not talk about here but that we can talk about in the lobby. If we could talk about that subject here I would say that respect and understanding for others does not violate my convictions about a certain subject. Of course I wouldn't say that because we can't talk about that here.![]()
No Zima jokes allowedYou know what? You can have my Bud Lite.
I'd no clue until now that Rasta culture is anti-LGBT.
Aaaaaand that's exactly why I think the Christian couple being fined for refusing to bake a cake is stupid. However, I think it's absolutely fine for everyone to boycott them, protest outside of their building, and do whatever they can (within the law) to put them out of business. But it isn't the government's responsibility to dictate what businesses can and can't do in terms of choosing who to serve to.
No Zima jokes allowed?
BTW what's up with that last bar I played in that had Bud Lite, Miller Lite, and Coors Light on tap but no non-light domestics?
And what, exactly, does that mean, from a first amendment perspective?
Strangely enough it was a hard drinkin' Polish Club.Singles bar?
Strangely enough it was a hard drinkin' Polish Club.
Look up Buju Banton song Boom Bye Bye.
"Boom Bye Bye in a batty bwoy head." Batty bwoys are gay men. Check out Sizzla, Capleton, etc. The older generation is way less talkative about it, but the feelings are the same. The newer generation have no problem speaking about it, cause they see it as truth. Many a concert has been canceled because the venue would not allow homophobia.
You seem committed. : DReligious and political connotations have nothing to do with me. That don't belong here.
I am non-denominational Christian male, I don't vote, and I will make my own damn cake.
Depends on the project. A lot of bands are about only one person's personal expression. And some bands have dress codes and conduct codes. Mine does, for example. We all wear the same thing and none of us drink during our gigs (some of us don't drink hardly at all). If that's what you're looking for, that's cool, but it will exclude you from certain bands, but not because they're necessarily anti-LGBT, just that's how they operate.If you are on stage in a dress, you'll get girls. Lots of them.
I am disappointed by how a solid portion of the players would "quit the band" or have a strong feeling against cross dressing on stage. Isn't that what playing music is for?!? Personal expression?
Totally agreed. Not cool at all. I love reggae music but not that anti-gay "murder music," as some call it.This means I can be officially colored out-of-touch with Rasta culture. The last reggae artist I saw in concert was Desmond Dekker in 79, and I would have been lost on these lyrics without the translation. Kind of blows my mind that with all things to be concerned about, that LGBTs occupy such a high place on anyone's list.
But to be fair, we saw Bugs change into a dress and Elmer didn'tAnd sort-of-back on the thread topic, my assessment is I would risk more fallout at a gig not wearing a bra than a dude wearing a dress. I've seen dudes in dresses since Zappa's "We're Only In It For The Money". Come to think of it, Bugs Bunny may have fooled Elmer Fudd, but not me.