• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Range Rover Runs Over Bikers

Bikers are idiots anyways "watch for bikers"... bitch, you're the one choosing to ride on a dangerous two wheeled vehicle with no seat belts or even safety gear half the time. I have blind spots, your don't. Watch for me, or don't ride. The bikers in this video were idiots too, doesn't matter who's right or wrong, just their driving habits before the whole altercation started, they already broke road laws.

Link Removed
 
After watching the video I don't doubt how the RR could have bumped the bike. A bike is more agile than a car, so when he moved from the side of the RR to the front and quickly slowed with no brake lights, it only took a few seconds in which the driver of the RR had no way to react to what was happening. Comparing the situation to if it had been another car isn't fair. To me all the talk about what gear he was in is pointless. You can clearly see the intention of the biker on the video.

I hope the driver of the RR isn't charged. It's hard to see from the video what they were doing to threaten him once they stopped him after bumping the bike. But it was clearly a reaction out of fear and in a situation where you fear for your own safety, not to mention the safety of your family, your adrenaline and fight or flight instinct takes over and you react without really weighing all the consequences.
 
+1. What the Range Rover driver did wasn't right, but I can completely understand that he could have been intimidated by those bikers to the point of irrationality. Especially with his family in the car.

Actually what he did was right. If you are in fear of your life or the life of a family member bein threatened, to get the hell out of there. There just happened to be a side effect to putting his family at safety. It's the same rationale across any and all methods of self defense.
 
my2yqudy.jpg
 
^ hee hee

@Solarman - the whole undercover thing threw me at first. My first thought was "awesome, they have some undercovers with them, maybe the idiots who did this will get busted on their testimony", I was seeing it as possibly a good thing until I started hearing that some of them were NOT necessarily undercover with the group but just off duty... then the one idiot actually joined in the attacking... bummer.
 

Latest posts