• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Some Shade from Ron Carter

It's just the time Ron Carter came up in, Stanley didn't really start playing electric until the second or third RTF album, all his early stuff with CTI etc. was on upright. As years went by younger and younger cats were brought up to kill on both electric and upright, it's normal now to have monsters like McBride, Patitucci who do both, it wasn't always like that.
Just like Quincy Jones and other cats from a different era, I give Carter a pass, props and tons of respect for such a huge body of great work.

Me too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
ok, finally was able to read the piece: i agree with RC if only because i play the EBG the same way he's playing DB --- whether jazz or funk (even rock) i'd rather play 'freshness' than be limited to a script someone else thinks is 'correct'. signature licks/grooves are a must, of course, but they're just a point of departure for me...and by not being chained to them = they can be dramatic (vs. obvious) when returning to them at the 'right time'. playing the same line for 3-5 minutes might be a test of endurance...but it's also the lowest bar.

here's a real test of endurance:


:D


ron carter is spot on. what some just called "passive-aggression" in his statement: i'd call diplomacy! :D

(if you feel offended by his POV you might consider upping your game!)


Cool. I don't approach it as an either/or proposition. There can be a place for both, even in the same project. I can lock down a static groove and free up the drummer from strict timekeeping or I can reharm on the fly.

I didn't get the impression that one was better than the other... it depends.

BTW nice take on a Weather Report/Jaco tune.
;)
 
+1! :laugh::thumbsup:

QJ is one of my favorite curmudgeons. (Great musician too!) He's so over the top at times (and does it so well) that you can't help but read some of his interviews without smiling and shaking your head while mumbling OMG! a dozen or more times before you're finished. The type of person my grandmother used to refer to, in her clipped New England accent, as "a real pisser." :)

And Q got roundly booed here too.
:D
 
I think Ron Carter's career is a good example of being in right place at the right time. I don't love his playing outside of Miles' second quintet. He doesn't have a sound/groove/soloing identity that I personally connect with, but I appreciate where his contributions fit through the history/pantheon of jazz music. To his credit, he has a very recognizable musical voice, and you always know "it's him" when you put a record on.

There are those that seem to be very comfortable with the skin they are in such as Ray Brown, Rufus Reid, John Clayton, Dave Holland, etc. and they give very freely in interviews and educational settings. There are others, that for some reason, find the need to maintain their status by making comments such as the ones in the original post.

If you are truly serving the music from an informed and sympathetic place, the instrument you play and the genre become irrelevant, and if, in service of the music, your part is a single one bar repetitive phrase, that comes with its own challenges and skill set.

Apparently he was in the right place a couple of thousand times. Not too shabby.

And considering how many people play, having a recognizable voice is a pretty big accomplishment.
 
If one hears only the quarter notes in the bass line one is either not listening carefully or one is listening to a novice bassist. In aviation there's a saying, "Some pilots have 1000 hours of experience and other pilots have 1 hour of experience 1000 times. You know which one I'd rather fly with." A bassist who hammers out nothing but quarter notes is analogous to the latter pilot.

That is pretty wild to distill walking bass down to just quarter notes. No chordal influence, no dynamics, etc... just a machine.
:D
 
I need to officially 'follow' you on here. I keep coming in like 'oh snap, Brad done swing the thought hammer', but always past tense

Posting from a 'I used to argue with Brad until it clicked for me' perspective. Type on sir.

Yeah, we clicked a while ago. Like Independence Day (the movie) it just took common adversaries.
;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElMon
He's got a point, how many of us can play Billie Jean w/o cramping up at least a little?

In all seriousness, if repetitive patterns like that are problematic, lighten up. I literally can't recall the last time I cramped up. Might've been in the 80's when I was low on Potassium.

Here's a cheat: play it on a five. It accomplishes a few things: multiple playing positions so you don't have to stay in one position. Play with the F# on the B string... much shorter reach AND noticeably deeper sound. And more.
;)
 
In a recent Downbeat interview Branford Marsalis said one of my favorite current "jazz" favorites Robert Glasper wasn't really jazz. High level jazz cats just have strong opinions.
I can see preserving classical vintage jazz as an art form but to not let it evolve and grow is death for it.
It's all jazz just, not his jazz. Brotherman Branford seems to forget that his idol Pops, was an innovator and brought jazz forward. Not leaving it frozen in time.

The same arguments comes up about anything the grows and changes over time.

Classical Music went through the same thing.

Matter of fact, all art forms have gone through this.

Remember when Bob Dylan went electric? :)

We go through this, P bass and an Ampeg B15 are the only tools for a 'real' bass player.
The upright bass is the only bass for jazz, the upright bass is the only bass for bass :)

So, I can dig if one wants to preserve something so it doesn't get forgotten and we can continue to learn
from it but to condemn the outgrowth from it seems silly to me :)

Gotta go and pick up my grandson...
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
It becomes tiresome when these ageing jazz musicians resort to these base tactics to appear 'edgy' in interviews. Ron Carter's backhanded compliments to electric bassists are just unnecessary. It would not be a difficult task to reel off scores of electric bassists from the jazz and fusion fields who could play him under the table. To do so would be to stop to his level and afford his comments a credibility they do not deserve.

I note that Wyton Marsalis was mentioned earlier. He's an even bigger stick in the mud; so backward-looking that he fails to realise that jazz was always about breaking boundaries above setting standards. His sickly pantomime of where jazz was sixty years ago is just silly.
 
It becomes tiresome when these ageing jazz musicians resort to these base tactics to appear 'edgy' in interviews. Ron Carter's backhanded compliments to electric bassists are just unnecessary. It would not be a difficult task to reel off scores of electric bassists from the jazz and fusion fields who could play him under the table. To do so would be to stop to his level and afford his comments a credibility they do not deserve.

I note that Wyton Marsalis was mentioned earlier. He's an even bigger stick in the mud; so backward-looking that he fails to realise that jazz was always about breaking boundaries above setting standards. His sickly pantomime of where jazz was sixty years ago is just silly.

well put on all accounts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loring and DJ Bebop