Why are older basses "coveted"???
- By Michedelic
- Basses [BG]
- 203 Replies
That's what I understand now. I only found out that generation Jones existed about two years ago. So, I get reclassified again. It's like being a species of exotic marine life that gets classified as some kind of mollusk, then a sea slug, then something else. I doubt it matters to the marine animal, and it amuses me a lot but doesn't matter much.
I encountered that phrase/sub-categorization a couple of years ago, and it resonated with me. For decades, being a part of that younger group, I often actually felt a bit estranged culturally from those older even though we were all classified as “boomers”. Case in point: while, as a grade school kid I certainly listened to Top 40 rock/pop(starting exactly 60 years ago, in 1966), and then transitioned into “underground” music after the Monterey Festival announced a new era, I couldn’t participate socially or in lifestyle, like those up to a decade or so older did. I was a consumer of Woodstock as a product(film, records, bubblegum cards*), but the event wasn’t my party.I just figured out the Jones thing a couple months ago mice elf.
But CBGB’s and the 100 Club was. Even before that, there was a divide…the smug, too cool for school writers of Rolling Stone, as directed by Jann Wenner(who thought he was the absolute tastemaker of the generation), absolutely despised Led Zeppelin, for being crass, shrill, and inauthentic, compared to the stars of 1967, and all the earnest folkie/blues types before that. Well, they were, in a way, but so what? My age group ate it up.
That’s just one facet of the micro-generation gap; there’s quite a bit of what I grew up with/experienced that those just a few years younger than me, still technically boomers, can’t relate to or are dismissive of.
*oh, I kid, but I was wanting to point out that, for such a ‘countercultural’ event, it still got commercialized, franchised, and exploited.